« Reminder: Call for Speakers for CALI Conference | Main | 9th Circuit: 'Bong Hits 4 Jesus' Banner Was Free Speech »
March 23, 2006
"I'm Sorry" legislation, an alternative to medical malpractice damage award caps?
| "I'm Sorry" States |
| • Arizona • California • Colorado • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Maryland • Massachusetts • Montana • North Carolina • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Texas • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia |
Source: |
"I'm Sorry" legislation allows physicians (and in some cases other health professionals) to apologize to patients without their statements being construed as admissions of negligence in medical malpractice lawsuits. Under the theory that hearing an apology is often enough to keep some people from suing medical practitioners, the intent of "I'm Sorry" legislation is to encourage open communication between patients and physicians by protecting what physicians say. See summary of survey results in below table, "Forgiving a Physician."
Iowa & Michigan Move Forward with "I'm Sorry" Legislation
Yesterday, the DesMoines Register reported that the Iowa House approved "I'm Sorry" legislation by a vote of 77-22. Commenting of Iowa House File 2716, Rep. Kraig Paulsen (R) said
The whole point is so doctors and professionals can have a bedside manner where they are able to express some sympathy when an outcome is adverse, regardless of whether there is negligence involved. You ought to be able to say, 'I am sorry the surgery did not go well.'
The language of Iowa House File 2716 is typical of "I'm Sorry" legislation.
1 1 Section 1. NEW SECTION. 622.31 EVIDENCE OF REGRET OR
1 2 SORROW.
1 3 In any civil action for professional negligence, personal
1 4 injury, or wrongful death or in any arbitration proceeding for
1 5 professional negligence, personal injury, or wrongful death
1 6 against a person in a profession represented by the examining
1 7 boards listed in section 272C.1 and any other licensed
1 8 profession recognized in this state, a hospital licensed
1 9 pursuant to chapter 135B, or a health care facility licensed
1 10 pursuant to chapter 135C, based upon the alleged negligence in
1 11 the practice of that profession or occupation, any portion of
1 12 a statement, affirmation, gesture, or conduct expressing
1 13 sorrow, sympathy, commiseration, condolence, compassion, or a
1 14 general sense of benevolence that was made by the person to
1 15 the plaintiff, relative of the plaintiff, or decision maker
1 16 for the plaintiff that relates to the discomfort, pain,
1 17 suffering, injury, or death of the plaintiff as a result of an
1 18 alleged breach of the applicable standard of care is
1 19 inadmissible as evidence of an admission of liability or as
1 20 evidence of an admission against interest.
Track the legislative history of HF 2716
Earlier this month, Michigan's House passed similar legislation, HB 4259, by a vote of 99-0.
HB 4259 text | Legislative History of HR 4259
According to The Sorry Works! Coalition, California passed the first "I'm Sorry" legislation in 1991. Since then, 17 other states have passed similar legislation. See table (above right).
Forgiving a Physician
When it comes to medical errors, patients consider some circumstances more forgivable than others. Here is what 958 people had to say about how likely they were to forgive a physician under these circumstances.
| Circumstance | Would forgive | Might forgive | Would not forgive |
| Patient did not tell the physician everything | 56% | 37% | 7% |
| Patient's condition was unusual and the physician was not familiar with it | 25% | 59% | 16% |
| An emergency situation | 20% | 58% | 22% |
| Physician got bad advice from another physician | 15% | 51% | 34% |
| Physician was too aggressive in the treatment | 10% | 65% | 25% |
| Physician wasn't the patient's regular physician | 10% | 57% | 33% |
| Physician was not aggressive enough in the treatment | 6% | 55% | 39% |
| Physician was tired or distracted | 6% | 27% | 68% |
| Physician wasn't thorough in the examination or in talking with the patient | 3% | 22% | 76% |
| Physician did not have, or forgot, important medical knowledge that most physicians have | 3% | 19% | 78% |
| Physician made a poor decision because he or she was trying to keep costs down | 3% | 8% | 89% |
| Physician did not follow up or did not monitor test results or treatment | 2% | 12% | 85% |
| Source: The Sorry Works! Coalition | |||
March 23, 2006 in Legislation in the News | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83425703153ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "I'm Sorry" legislation, an alternative to medical malpractice damage award caps?:
» 'I'm Sorry' Legislation from Insurance Coverage Blog
A number of states, Idaho being one of the latest, have enacted legislation thatallows doctors to apologize to patients without it being used as evidence against them. Here is a short story about Idaho's law.Here is another.&nbs... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 19, 2006 12:33:44 PM