Friday, January 15, 2010
Eduardo M. Penalver (Cornell) and Sonia Katyal (Fordham) have posted on SSRN the front matter and introduction to their new book, Property Outlaws: How Squatters, Pirates, and Protesters Improve the Law of Ownership (Yale University Press, 2010). Click on the picture for a link to the book on Amazon; here is the abstract to the SSRN posting:
Property Outlaws puts forth the intriguingly counterintuitive proposition that, in the case of both tangible and intellectual property law, disobedience can often lead to an improvement in legal regulation. The authors argue that in property law there is a tension between the competing demands of stability and dynamism, but its tendency is to become static and fall out of step with the needs of society.
The authors employ wide-ranging examples of the behaviors of “property outlaws” - the trespasser, squatter, pirate, or file-sharer-to show how specific behaviors have induced legal innovation. They also delineate the similarities between the actions of property outlaws in the spheres of tangible and intellectual property. An important conclusion of the book is that a dynamic between the activities of “property outlaws” and legal innovation should be cultivated in order to maintain this avenue of legal reform.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
From the folks at US EPA Smart Growth Program
now available online!
These videos provide a direct look at why this year's winning
communities, from rural farmland to an urban downtown, make great places
to live, work and play. The videos include stunning shots of smart
growth in practice, as well as interviews with policy makers and local
citizens from each of the four award winners.
Congratulations again to the 2009 winners!
Overall Excellence in Smart Growth
Envision Lancaster County Comprehensive
Lancaster County Planning Commission, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Policies and Regulations
The City of Charlotte
Charlotte Department of Transportation, Charlotte, North Carolina
Parkside of Old Town
Chicago Housing Authority, FitzGerald Associates Architects, and Holsten
Real Estate Development Corporation, Chicago, Illinois
Smart Growth & Green Building
Tempe Transportation Center
City of Tempe and Architekton + Otak, Tempe, Arizona
Jamie Baker Roskie
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
“International Human Rights and Climate Change”
at the University of Georgia School of Law in Athens, Georgia.
Thomas Pogge, of Yale University, will present the keynote address: “Poverty, Climate Change, and Overpopulation,” exploring the extent to which the struggles to deal with these three phenomena are in competition with one another and/or synergistic, using a human rights standard as a common metric of assessment.
The day long conference will take the form of a moderated round table discussion, with a lunchtime keynote address.
Topics: The United Nations’ Process of Linking Human Rights and Climate Change; Potential Human Rights Effects of Proposed Climate Change Regime; Litigation— including Citizen Suits, Judicial Review, and Access to Information; Human Rights and Environmental Regulation; Climate Change Refugees.
The conference is slated to offer 5.5 MCLE Credits, including 1 Trial Practice and 1 Professionalism Credit.
Participants include: Prof. Peter Appel, University of Georgia; Prof. Dan Bodansky, University of Georgia; Prof. John Bonine, University of Oregon; Prof. Rebecca Bratspies, City University of New York; Prof. Harlan Cohen, University of Georgia; Prof. John Knox, Wake Forest University; Prof. Svitlana Kravchenko, University of Oregon; Ms. Elizabeth O’Sullivan, US EPA Region 4; Prof. Naomi Roht-Arriaza, University of California, Hastings College of Law; and Prof. Dinah Shelton, George Washington University.
More information can be found at: http://www.law.uga.edu/international-human-rights-and-climate-change-conference. If you have any further questions, please contact: Blake McDaniel, Executive Conference Editor, at: email@example.com or (229) 522-0790.
Jamie Baker Roskie
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Like most areas of the country, the Central Alabama River Region has suffered from the residential and commercial real estate problems.
To chronicle specific examples, I've begun a series of informal "windshield" tours of problem projects in our region. The first in the series is a lifestyle center in a suburb north of Montgomery.
This city incentivized the development (just as the crisis was hitting in 2007), in part, by adding new infrastructure. To pay for that infrastructure, news reports indicate that the city issued bonds--to be paid back through the increased sales tax revenue that the city would realize from the new stores.
The problem? The vast majority of the lifestyle center never found tenants. The big question facing the city will be how do they pay back the bonds if the lifestyle center remains this dormant.
Here's the video:
--Chad Emerson, Faulkner U.
Monday, January 11, 2010
The Journal of Land, Resources, & Environmental Law (Utah) has published its new issue, Vol. 29, No. 2 (2009). The articles, with links to the abstracts (the journal also links to the full .pdf articles):
Raymond B. Wrabley, Jr., Managing the Monument: Cows and Conservation in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument.
Marc F. Bellemare (Duke--Pubic Policy & Economics) has posted The Productivity Impacts of De Jure and De Facto Land Rights. The abstract:
There is an important literature on the causal relationship between the quality of institutions and macroeconomic performance. This paper studies this link at the micro level by looking at the productivity impacts of land rights. Whereas previous studies used proxies for soil quality and instruments to control for the endogeneity of land titles, the data used here include precise measures of soil quality, which allow controlling for both the heterogeneity between plots and the endogeneity of land titles. Results indicate that de jure rights (i.e., titles) have no impact on productivity and de facto rights have heterogeneous productivity impacts. Productivity is higher for plots on which landowners report having the right to plant trees, but lower for plots on which landowners report having the right to build a tomb and the right to lease out. Moreover, while the right to lease out increases both the likelihood that the landowner has the intention to seek a title for her plot and her willingness to pay to do so, whether her children will enjoy similar rights on the plot has the opposite effect.
I ran across this recent story from the local Bluffton, South Carolina paper on one of my listservs. The inter-county nature of the issues caught my attention--especially with the state legislature apparently getting involved:
In May, Herbkersman introduced a bill to strengthen Beaufort County’s legal hand in the face of development runoff from neighboring counties.
The bill, H. 4020, was co-sponsored by Reps. Richard Chalk, R-Hilton Head, Shannon Erickson, R-Beaufort, and Curtis Brantley, a Democrat who represents Jasper County and part of Beaufort County.
The bill was sent to the Senate, where it awaits action. The legislation would allow Beaufort County to sue Jasper, Colleton and Hampton counties if their traffic and storm water runoff affect the quality of life in Beaufort County.
One interesting things about the dynamic in this matter is that, as the article discusses, Beaufort County is a fairly well-off county while most of the others are among the economically-weakest in the state.
This reminds me somewhat of a paper that one of my students wrote last semester in Land Planning and Development that discussed the law, equity, and ethical issues facing counties and cities with large landfills and other waste dumps. Apparently, in pursuit of even small amounts of revenue, some impoverished jurisdictions are more willing to accept projects that could have longer-term negative effects.
I'm not saying that this story and that issue present a perfect analogy. But, in today's tough economic times, it will be interesting to see how much a jurisdiction is willing to bend long-term goals to generate short-term results.
--Chad Emerson, Faulkner, U.
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Stephen Miller on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Josh Galperin on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jesse Richardson on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Uber Goes to the State House Seeking Preemption of Local Government Control
- Stephen R. Miller on Why are building inspectors so often on the take?
- Tekle on Percent-for-Art Ordinances
- Michael Gerrard on Climate Change and Land Use Law
- Touro Law hosts First Annual Conference of the Land Use & Sustainable Development Law Institute
- Abstracts for 6th Annual Colloquium on Environmental Scholarship due May 1
- Space and the City - Special edition of The Economist