Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Lane on Federal/State Impacts on Property Rights in Australia

Patricia Lane (Sydney) has posted An Unholy Alliance – Combined Federal/State Impacts on Property Rights in Australia.  The abstract:

The Australian Constitution contains a guarantee that Federal laws for acquisition of property must provide for compensation on ‘just terms’. The Constitutions of the Australian States contain no such guarantee of ‘just terms’ compensation for State government acquisition of property. State Governments, however, are the polities with the primary responsibility for land regulation, including land titles, land management, and regulation of the exploitation of land-based resources. The Federal Government has to deal with cross-state environmental and land management issues, such as water allocations, land salinity, and protection of threatened and protected species, and to deal with the challenges of climate change, in a way that recognises and respects the separation of powers between the Federal and State governments. To what extent can the Federal government act in concert with the States to terminate resource exploitation rights, or ordinary land-use rights, in a way that does not require compensation on just terms for the holder of those rights be compensated on just terms? This paper examines the extent of State and Commonwealth obligations to compensate persons whose property rights in land or resources are curtailed or sterilised by regulatory mechanisms directed to resource security or environmental protection, in the light of recent High Court decisions on the acquisition power.

Matt Festa


Comparative Land Use, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Federal Government, Property, Property Rights, Scholarship, State Government, Sustainability, Takings, Water | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:


Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lane on Federal/State Impacts on Property Rights in Australia: