Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Marsh & Pyatt on the Stagnation of Indiana Real Property Law

Tanya D. Marsh (Wake Forest) and April Sparks Pyatt (Ice Miller) have posted The Stagnation of Indiana Real Property Law, Indiana Law Review, Vol. 43, p. 697 (2010).  The abstract:

This essay argues that common law of real property law in Indiana, and more broadly, is stagnating. This stagnation of the common law of property results from a combination of factors. Transactional attorneys view the litigation process as unworkable, particularly in the real estate context,for three key reasons: (1) the cost; (2) the length of time until resolution; and (3) the uncertain outcome. If neither the common law nor statutory law provide easy answers to an issue, the parties are likely to conclude that they are better off resolving their differences out of court rather than spending time and money to achieve an unpredictable result. This situation is a classic Catch-22 - the parties to real estate disputes refuse to bring their cases to the appellate courts in part because of the failure of the courts to modernize the Indiana common law of property, but the appellate courts of Indiana have limited opportunities to modernize the law because of the failure of parties to modern disputes to allow their cases to be heard.

Matt Festa

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/land_use/2010/11/marsh-pyatt-on-the-stagnation-of-indiana-real-property-law.html

Caselaw, Property, Real Estate Transactions, Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0134897501b5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Marsh & Pyatt on the Stagnation of Indiana Real Property Law:

Comments

Post a comment