Thursday, September 2, 2010

Chang & Sigman on Cost Recovery in Superfund Cases

Howard F. Chang (Pennsylvania) and Hilary Sigman (Rutgers--Economics) have posted
Economic theory developed in the prior literature indicates that under the joint and several liability imposed by the federal Superfund statute, the government should recover more of its costs of cleaning up contaminated sites than it would under nonjoint liability, and the amount recovered should increase with the number of defendants and with the independence among defendants in trial outcomes. We test these predictions empirically using data on outcomes in federal Superfund cases. Theory also suggests that this increase in the amount recovered may discourage the sale and redevelopment of potentially contaminated sites (or “brownfields”). We find the increase to be substantial, which suggests that this implicit tax on sales may be an important deterrent for parties contemplating brownfields redevelopment.
Matt Festa

Environmental Law, Federal Government, Real Estate Transactions, Redevelopment, Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Chang & Sigman on Cost Recovery in Superfund Cases: