Sunday, July 18, 2010

Leshy on a Property Clause for the Twenty-First Century

John D. Leshy (Hastings) has posted A Property Clause for the Twenty-First Century, published in University of Colorado Law Review Vol. 75 (2004).  The abstract:

This article tries to draw some lessons from the way the Supreme Court has addressed implementation of the Property Clause of the U.S. Constitution by the Congress and the Executive, the more political branches of the national government. The Court has long said that the Property Clause contains no judicially enforceable limits on those other branches, and that stance is likely to continue. This article argues, instead, that the Property Clause can be said to have framed an attitude the Supreme Court has brought to bear on legal issues involving federal lands. That attitude, which may fairly be viewed as an expression of constitutional common law, favors retention of federal land in national ownership (retention), national over state and local authority (nationalization), and environmental preservation (conservation). It concludes that the Court’s decisions embodying that attitude have left a decidedly positive imprint on American life and culture.

Matt Festa

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/land_use/2010/07/leshy-on-a-property-clause-for-the-twentyfirst-century.html

Caselaw, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Federal Government, Judicial Review, Property Rights, Scholarship, Takings | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef013485874062970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Leshy on a Property Clause for the Twenty-First Century:

Comments