Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Enough with Jane Jacobs Already?

Check out this really interesting piece from the Wall Street Journal: Enough With Jane Jacobs Already, by Andrew Manshel.  Manshel is with the nonprofit Greater Jamaica Development Corp.  He argues that while Jane Jacobs was right about many things, the enshrinement of her views in planning circles should be reassessed.  He says that now is the time, due to Mayor Bloomberg's Charter Revision Commission process.  Lots of interesting thoughts in this opinion piece, so it's hard to know what parts to highlight.    

Jacobs's book is generally regarded as a jeremiad in opposition to the large-scale planning of the '50s and '60s. She is celebrated as the individual who did the most to end that era's Robert Moses and Le Corbusier-inspired, automobile-centric view of urban life. In Jacobs's opinion, the ideal of city living was the West Village of Manhattan, with its short blocks, narrow streets and little shops. She praised the human-scale aspects of city life; the "eyes on the street" of the shopkeeper and the social cohesion promoted by "street corner mayors." In her view, large-scale planning was prone to failure.

Are you with Jacobs, or are you with Bob Moses and Le Corbusier??

Her views have now been broadly adopted and it is conventional wisdom in planning circles that participatory neighborhood planning is best, that preservation of old buildings is essential, and that in cities the car is bad. But Jacobs had a tendency toward sweeping conclusions based on anecdotal information, and some of them were overblown and/or oblivious to the facts. Perhaps most graphically, Jacobs predicted that the grand arts center planned for the Upper West Side of Manhattan would fail. But Lincoln Center turned out to be a great success—igniting the revitalization of the entire neighborhood.

More revealingly, the Greenwich Village she held out as a model for city life has become some of the highest-priced real estate in New York City—it's no longer the diverse, yeasty enclave she treasured. Ultimately, many of the policies she advocated blocked real-estate development—causing prices of existing housing stock to rise and pricing out all but the wealthiest residents.

Manshel calls for more attention to the ideas of William H. Whyte, who inspired Bryant Park and Houston's Discovery Green, among other projects.  Manshel isn't the first to challenge Jacobs' legacy recently: see Benjamin Schwarz's recent Atlantic piece.  What do you think about Manshel's critique of the citizen-participation focus?  Again, it's a quick and thought-provoking read, so check it out.  

 

Matt Festa

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/land_use/2010/07/enough-with-jane-jacobs-already.html

Density, Development, Historic Preservation, Houston, Local Government, New York, Pedestrian, Planning, Politics, Redevelopment, Transportation, Urbanism | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01348544b2a1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Enough with Jane Jacobs Already?:

Comments

[Please forgive this double posting, as this is the first time I'm posting on this blog, and it seems as though I may be having trouble getting through. But please keep this posting and delete the earlier one, if need be, as I've corrected at least some of the typos in my first attempt at a comment. Thanks!]

"Enough with Casual Misrepresentations of Jane Jacobs Already"

I hope that those who are interested in this topic will be sure to check out my comments to the both the Andrew Manshel and the Benjamin Schwarz essays -- both of which hardly seem to be about what Jane Jacobs wrote, said, or did, at all, but rather about a number myths that have arisen about her over time, especially since her death (when she is no longer around to set the record straight). Some day I hope to write a more extensive debunking of these myths (which I'm now thinking of entitling, "Enough with Casual Misrepresentations of Jane Jacobs Already"), but my quick comments to both of these essays will at least help, hopefully, to get the ball rolling toward a discussion of whether or not, as Yogi Berra might say, "Jane Jacobs actually wrote everything she [supposedly] wrote."

My two comments in the “Enough Already with Jane Jacobs” thread (see the “Comments” tab) are currently towards the end of the thread. My first comment, which is in two parts, is dated, 7/2/10, 11:45 p.m.; my second comment, which is in three parts, is dated 7/3/10, 12:50 p.m. (In order to see the third part of my second comment, one has to click on page 2.)

Also, I have a number of similar comments in the “Gentrification and Its Discontents” thread (which are the comments on the Benjamin Schwarz essay) on the Atlantic Monthly online website. My first two comments begin about three or four comments down the page; and then I have another comment about half way down the page.

Benjamin Hemric
July 8, 2010, 7:45 p.m.

Posted by: Benjamin Hemric | Jul 8, 2010 4:48:57 PM