Monday, June 7, 2010
The New York Times Magazine had an interesting article this weekend about squatters in Buffalo. The larger issue concerned the freegan movement - "Above all, freegans are dedicated to salvaging what others waste and — when possible — living without the use of currency." The focus of the article was on their occupation and renovation of a Buffalo mansion. Property folks will love the discussion of what the concept of "private property" meant to the freegans. As much as they disliked the idea of being property owners, with the ability to summon law enforcement to protect their property rights, they struggled with the difficulty of managing the upkeep of the mansion as one large, unowned commons. Ultimately, one of the freegans used the legal system to obtain legal ownership of the house, with all of the benefits - and headaches - that ownership entails.
Ngai Pindell, UNLV
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Katherine Dentzman on A Coordinated Approach to Food Safety and Land Use Law at the Urban Fringe
- Jesse Richardson on Local Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Local Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing
- Samuel on Schleicher and Rauch on local regulation of the sharing economy
- Timothy Wayne George on Is Reed v. Town of Gilbert an important sign case?
- Water Down Under: A Report from Australia by Barb Cosens: Post 2: Comparative Water Law: Australia and the western United States or Conversations with Claire
- APA Planning & Law Division's Smith-Babcock-Williams Student Writing Competition now accepting entries
- Jan 30 - Boston U Law - The Iron Triangle of Food Policy - AJLM Symposium
- "Basic Human Right" to Farm Your Lawn?
- CFP: Fordham Law: Sharing Economy, Sharing City: Urban Law and the New Economy