Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Changes in Mass Transit...

While the Orlando/Tampa area is gaining a major mass transit program, the City of Atlanta recently suffered a big regulatory blow to its plans for expanded transit options:

In a blow to Atlanta’s hopes for a rebirth in transportation, the Obama administration has passed over the city’s application for a federal stimulus grant to build a streetcar on Peachtree Street. 

In fact, in a two-page list of grant recipients including many in the Southeast, Georgia appears not to have a single project. Atlanta, local business groups and MARTA applied for $298.3 million, the total amount needed to construct the streetcar. The city and the business groups would have shared the cost of operations, helped by ticket fares, advertising revenues, and naming rights. MARTA would have administered the grant. The city also suggested smaller versions of the project that would cost less, but no dice. Streetcars operated in Atlanta until 1949.

The loss for the streetcar is one more drop in the bucket of metro Atlanta's mass transit misery. MARTA, the only public transit system of its size in the U.S. that receives no significant, sustained state funding, according to transit officials, is facing a disaster in the next fiscal year, when it will have to cut more than $100 million out of its operating budget. Clayton, one of the five core metro Atlanta counties, has decided that it can pave roads, but it shouldn't have to fund buses, so it is completely shutting down C-Tran on March 31.

As someone who lives just a couple hours away from Atlanta, we enjoy visiting the city often. One of the nicest things is the fairly expansive availability of fixed rail mass transit (the MARTA system).

Indeed, a case can be made that Atlanta is the only Southeastern U.S. city where a resident could reasonably live without owning a car. There is enough horizontal and vertical mixed use near several of the MARTA stops that living, working, and meeting your daily needs without a car is viable.

It seems quite odd then that the current Administration would fund high speed rail lines between two Florida cities that don't have a great deal of crossover use while neglecting the type of intra-city and intra-region transit that really would reduce the need for vehicular travel.

One final note: for my smart growth seminar this semester, I'm taking the students on a series of "site visit" classes. In March we'll travel to Atlanta where everyone will park their cars at the airport and then travel the city via MARTA while studying legal issues related to pedestrian activity versus vehicular activity--looking especially at how transit-oriented development is and is not affected to land use laws and regulations.

--Chad Emerson, Faulkner U.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/land_use/2010/02/changes-in-mass-transit.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef012877af8692970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Changes in Mass Transit...:

Comments

Chad - I think some blame can be laid at the feet of state leaders. The current Georgia administration left millions of state transportation dollars on the table in recent years due to lack of planning for high speed rail. This latest snub may be a result of more of the same.

Posted by: Jamie Baker Roskie | Feb 17, 2010 10:45:59 AM

The mass Transit program is the need of the hour. It will solve the growing problems of transportation in the city and provide excellent solution to the citizens to enjoy a peaceful and comfortable inter city transportation system that is cheap and convenient.

Posted by: packaging supplier | Feb 18, 2010 5:02:35 AM