Tuesday, March 10, 2009
What do property owners want from their local land use laws? I read this week a good student paper on zoning, in which the student cited many economic analyses that stated, with only slight generalization, that what homeowners want from their land use rules is the maximization of property values at resale. Period.
This is surely is an oversimplification concerning land use law –- a theme that I touched on last week. One of the points that economists are supposed to emphasize is that economics isn’t just about money; it’s about preferences of all kinds. As most homeowners would tell you, there are a lot of things other than resale value that he or she wants from land use law. The homeowner probably wants from government good schools, good roads, easy traffic, well-maintained parks, low crime, and other attributes of a pleasant community. In truly private company, the homeowner might even tell you that he or she prefers a certain socioeconomic or racial makeup of the community, which may well be affected by land use law. Many of these attributes indirectly affect property resale values, of course, but most are preferred for their own sake.
In defending restrictive lands use laws, local governments know that the tried and true defense of “maintaining property values” usually makes for a solid defense. But let’s not forget that the other, more direct issues, are probably foremost in the minds of many property owners when they vote and make demands of local land use law.
[Comments must be approved and thus take some time to appear online.]
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Stephen Miller on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Josh Galperin on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jesse Richardson on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Uber Goes to the State House Seeking Preemption of Local Government Control
- Stephen R. Miller on Why are building inspectors so often on the take?
- Can UberPOOL Make Carpooling Cool?
- Are Earth Day cookies an endangered species?
- Fordham Urban Law Center's Sharing Economy | Sharing City Conference - April 24
- Land Use, Telescopes and Sacred Land in Paradise
- Tekle on Percent-for-Art Ordinances