Thursday, March 19, 2009
How will the increasing ethnic diversity of America affect land use law? One way that immigration is bound to change the law is that people from other nations will bring different perceptions of what makes a pleasant community. The San Francisco Chronicle yesterday ran a story about a survey of how residents from different ethnic areas in Oakland (pic below) perceive their neighborhoods. (Here’s a copy of a survey form.)
I’m beginning today my teaching of land use law to first-year law students. One of the points that I’ll stress is that a bias in favor of single-family-home suburbia has been inherent in much American law over the past century. With today’s rapid influx of people from other nations, however, the commonly shared ideal of a pleasant community (to the extent that there ever was one) may dissolve. The Oakland survey found that immigrants from Latin America or China tend to prefer –- and tend to construct –- neighborhoods that remind them of their home country (or at least the comforting aspects of that home country). This may involve less orientation toward the automobile and private space and more emphasis on pedestrianism, sidewalk commerce, and vibrant public spaces.
Who knows –- in 2026, we may get a judge who was the child of immigrants writing an important court opinion that, tossing 1926’s Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. on its head, by stating that “the integration of residential, business, and small industrial buildings will provide a more favorable environment for a community in which to rear children .…”
[Comments must be approved and thus take some time to appear online.]
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Stephen Miller on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Josh Galperin on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jesse Richardson on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Uber Goes to the State House Seeking Preemption of Local Government Control
- Stephen R. Miller on Why are building inspectors so often on the take?
- Can UberPOOL Make Carpooling Cool?
- Are Earth Day cookies an endangered species?
- Fordham Urban Law Center's Sharing Economy | Sharing City Conference - April 24
- Land Use, Telescopes and Sacred Land in Paradise
- Tekle on Percent-for-Art Ordinances