Tuesday, February 24, 2009
How will the economic depression (I’m not the first to say it) affect environmental land use polices? For some large-scale issues, such as suburban sprawl and natural resource degradation, the slump will diminish the harms and make conservationist land use policies more effective.
But for other issues that require special efforts by government, environmental land use protections may not fare so well. In the past 24 hours, public radio broadcast a number of interesting stories about clashes between land use laws and economic pressures. First, Marketplace reported on pressures against preservation of historic buildings in Temecula, Cal., where some landowners are more than ever desirous of transforming buildings to the most profitable uses. Even more significant are stories about calls for government stimulus spending to build a new electricity grid that fosters long-distance transmissions of “green” electricity (from wind and solar, for example) and to build new super-high-speed rail lines between big cities (see story and map). In both instances, these efforts may clash sharply with the interests of local governments, which don’t want their land torn up for new power or rail lines.
We have heard a lot of talk about how the private market must yield to the federal government in these economic times, but it may be just as interesting to see whether the federal government attempts to use its muscle to override local land use control to foster plans that may be both environmentally friendly for the nation and stimulative to the economy, but which are likely to be bitterly opposed by affected localities and their landowning citizens …
[Comments must be approved and thus take some time to appear online.]
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Stephen Miller on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Josh Galperin on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jesse Richardson on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Uber Goes to the State House Seeking Preemption of Local Government Control
- Stephen R. Miller on Why are building inspectors so often on the take?
- Can UberPOOL Make Carpooling Cool?
- Are Earth Day cookies an endangered species?
- Fordham Urban Law Center's Sharing Economy | Sharing City Conference - April 24
- Land Use, Telescopes and Sacred Land in Paradise
- Tekle on Percent-for-Art Ordinances