Thursday, February 26, 2009
It’s an old joke that making predictions is difficult, especially about the future. In response to posts earlier this week, Catherine LaCroix at Case Western Reserve directs us to a website (with references to a report and book) about the shrinking of industrial cities such as Cleveland. The depopulation of cities may not be thoroughly depressing –- it opens up fascinating opportunities for environmental projects, which are especially promising in an age of low property values, creative eminent domain, and a thawing public opposition to innovative urban land uses, such as the growing of food on an one-acre city lot or raising a flock of chickens for backyard urban eggs. (See this Cleveland chicken story.)
The future of “dying” cities may surprise us, as does today the reports of the surprisingly successful economic condition of New Orleans three years after Katina –- in large part (skeptics note) because of the economic stimulus of shovel projects. Urban farms might end up as a signature of Cleveland as much as did closing steel mills or the Rock ‘n’ Roll Hall of Fame did in previous decades. And it may assuage somewhat the concern that suburban sprawl is gobbling up valuable farmland –- a concern that has always struck me as overstated. I’m of the age that reminds me of the passage from the old Talking Heads song: “There was a shopping mall. Now it's all covered with flowers ... Once there were parking lots. Now it's a peaceful oasis” …
[Comments must be approved and thus take some time to appear online.]
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Stephen Miller on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Josh Galperin on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jesse Richardson on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Uber Goes to the State House Seeking Preemption of Local Government Control
- Stephen R. Miller on Why are building inspectors so often on the take?
- Can UberPOOL Make Carpooling Cool?
- Are Earth Day cookies an endangered species?
- Fordham Urban Law Center's Sharing Economy | Sharing City Conference - April 24
- Land Use, Telescopes and Sacred Land in Paradise
- Tekle on Percent-for-Art Ordinances