Wednesday, January 7, 2009
In San Diego for the first time in more than a decade this week, I find that the city’s once-proud main street, Broadway, still holds more homeless people pr block than almost any place in the nation, that the downtown revival shopping mall, Horton Plaza, still holds up as perhaps the best example of its type (admittedly not a difficult competition), and that the downtown waterfront has sprouted so many new sleek condo and apartment high-rises (most of which actually appear to be occupied) that from some angles it almost looks like Vancouver. Always in the shadow of its not-to-spoken-of colossus to the north, San Diego remains an extraordinarily pleasant city.
One of the benefits of travel is learning about fascinating controversies of local land use law. I was told today about the long-simmering debate over a specially isolated Children’s Pool Beach in La Jolla, which in the 1990s was colonized by ocean seals. Because humans on the beach harass the seals (arguably contrary to the Marine Mammal Protection Act) and because seals posed a threat to children, the planned human use did not mesh with the seals’ presence (with an interesting but not unexpected dash of classism in assertions that wealthy La Jollans preferred seals to human visitors from poor neighborhoods). After some years of debate and legal wrangling, the seals appear to have won their right to the beach. This sounds like the right choice to me; special beaches can be created many places, whereas homes for embattled marine mammals are far and few between.
[Comments must be approved and thus take some time to appear online.]
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Stephen Miller on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Josh Galperin on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jesse Richardson on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Uber Goes to the State House Seeking Preemption of Local Government Control
- Stephen R. Miller on Why are building inspectors so often on the take?
- Can UberPOOL Make Carpooling Cool?
- Are Earth Day cookies an endangered species?
- Fordham Urban Law Center's Sharing Economy | Sharing City Conference - April 24
- Land Use, Telescopes and Sacred Land in Paradise
- Tekle on Percent-for-Art Ordinances