Thursday, September 4, 2008
Should government pay special attention to the effect of land use laws on distinctive private land uses? Should government act affirmatively to try to preserve these distinctive land uses?
Today brings a sad announcement: The operator of Astroland, the unique beachfront amusement park on Coney Island, Brooklyn, New York, has announced that it will close the business for good this weekend. Astroland, which opened in the outer-space-besotted America of 1962, offers vintage rides and bizarre carnival acts. But this kind of entertainment is no longer as popular as it once was, and some complained that both the city and the owner of the land might prefer more high-income-oriented land uses. The operator reportedly complained that it was unable to get more than a one-year lease. Government officials are already acting to encourage Astroland to stay.
If your image of Coney Island is the famous Cyclone roller coaster (operated by Astroland for many years), worry not: it is a designated historic landmark and won’t be closing.
[Comment must be approved and thus take some time to appear online.]
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Katherine Dentzman on A Coordinated Approach to Food Safety and Land Use Law at the Urban Fringe
- Jesse Richardson on Local Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Local Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing
- Samuel on Schleicher and Rauch on local regulation of the sharing economy
- Timothy Wayne George on Is Reed v. Town of Gilbert an important sign case?
- Jan 30 - Boston U Law - The Iron Triangle of Food Policy - AJLM Symposium
- "Basic Human Right" to Farm Your Lawn?
- CFP: Fordham Law: Sharing Economy, Sharing City: Urban Law and the New Economy
- Fennell and Peñalver on Exactions Creep
- March 11-13: Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute's annual conference: Western Places/Western Spaces: Building Fair & Resilient Communities