Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Competition encourages localities to use land use laws to foster social goals and to push away undesirable uses … and people. In the Dallas suburb of Farmers Branch, the city is persistent in efforts to make it both illegal and impossible for immigrants in the United States unlawfully to live in the city. After a federal judge barred an earlier ordinance in part because it used standards different from those of federal immigration law, the city has revised its ordinance, which would require potential rental tenants to get rental licenses from the city. The city would then try to confirm the tenant’s status; anyone shown to be in the United States unlawfully would be barred from renting in the city.
Which would be the surest outcome of such an ordinance: The encouragement of Latino residents to rent in neighboring towns, a black market in the rental market, or a bottleneck in the government approval process? All three?
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Katherine Dentzman on A Coordinated Approach to Food Safety and Land Use Law at the Urban Fringe
- Jesse Richardson on Local Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Local Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing
- Samuel on Schleicher and Rauch on local regulation of the sharing economy
- Timothy Wayne George on Is Reed v. Town of Gilbert an important sign case?
- Water Down Under: A Report from Australia by Barb Cosens: Post 2: Comparative Water Law: Australia and the western United States or Conversations with Claire
- APA Planning & Law Division's Smith-Babcock-Williams Student Writing Competition now accepting entries
- Jan 30 - Boston U Law - The Iron Triangle of Food Policy - AJLM Symposium
- "Basic Human Right" to Farm Your Lawn?
- CFP: Fordham Law: Sharing Economy, Sharing City: Urban Law and the New Economy