Thursday, December 27, 2007
[New Suburbia: One of a series about new aspects of the suburban realm.]
Critics of the suburbs like to excoriate fast-food joints as the quintessence of soulless, auto-bound, conformist, fattening suburbia. But it is interesting to relate the fate of McDonald's, the nation's most famous fast-food purveyor, with the attitudes of Americans about where they chose to live. (As for me, I haven't partaken of the golden arches since law school, which was a long time ago.) As McDonald's' popularity flagged in recent decades, some linked it to the oft-predicted but rarely-documented rejection of suburbia by Americans in favor of a more healthy and imaginative lifestyles. But the recent news is that McDonald's' sales are back up, in large part attributable to soaring breakfast purchases; many more Americans are driving to McDonald's and then eating as they make their long driving commutes.
Either this expanding phenomenon is an example of Americans' accepting (embracing?) the lifestyle of ever-longer commutes from exurban homes to their jobs, or, as some critics might suggest, the sad result of land use laws and policies that "force" Americans to live far from their workplaces. Let the arguments about the lessons of McDonald's breakfasts begin …
[Note: Comments must be approved and thus take some time to appear online.]
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Over the Christmas weekend I watched again "It's a Wonderful Life," the great 1947 film about housing and credit (and other things, I suppose). This year, I was struck by a scene early in the film in which the evil financier Potter chastises the saintly operators of the Bailey Building and Loan for granting mortgage loans to those without a solid credit history, including "garlic eaters" who bought pleasant little homes in easy-credit-fueled "Bailey Park."
It occurred to me that the current spate of proposals for laws to toughen mortgage credit requirements is an echo of Potter. (This is not to suggest, of course, that most mortgage lenders over the past decade were spurred by Bailey-like altruism.) The result is that far fewer loans will be given to families without a strong credit history, and far fewer loans made to immigrants and lower-income members of racial minority groups. For land use, this will mean far fewer "Bailey Parks" -- that is, there will be a greatly diminished demand for modest homes. This will translate into a drying up of new construction for small houses -- perhaps for many years -- and a concomitant increase in the demand for apartments, by families who otherwise would have been buying. It remains to be seen whether local government land use law will be able to respond nimbly to these changes in housing demand. It's not always such a wonderful life …
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Stephen Miller on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Josh Galperin on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jesse Richardson on New Arkansas law requires local governments to pay for a "takings" where certain "regulatory programs" reduce FMV by at least 20 percent
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Uber Goes to the State House Seeking Preemption of Local Government Control
- Stephen R. Miller on Why are building inspectors so often on the take?
- Can UberPOOL Make Carpooling Cool?
- Are Earth Day cookies an endangered species?
- Fordham Urban Law Center's Sharing Economy | Sharing City Conference - April 24
- Land Use, Telescopes and Sacred Land in Paradise
- Tekle on Percent-for-Art Ordinances