Friday, September 14, 2007
A parcel designated as “Open Land” in Natchez, Miss., has been used as a paved parking lot. This says a lot about the nation’s “open space” laws. But the lot may soon become the new home to Fat Mama’s Tamales, thanks to a Mississippi court opinion that upheld this week a city decision to rezone the land. (Adams v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the City of Natchez, No. 2006-CC-00699 (Miss. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2007)).
Fat Mama’s had to move from its previous location when the federal government took the land by eminent domain for a national historical park facility. Neighbors of the “open land” complained that the decision to re-zone for business constituted “spot zoning.” But the appellate court concluded that spot-zoning violations typically are found only when zoning is done “to favor” someone (and no evidence of that here, of course). The court upheld the change, concluding that the re-zoning would not be “out of harmony” with the area, which already holds a number of businesses. So let’s shed a tear for the loss of one more “open space” in the United States, and let’s order a pitcher of margaritas …
Thursday, September 13, 2007
Although a stereotype is that most coal comes from the mountains of Appalachia, the largest coal-producing state in the nation is Wyoming, especially in the Powder River Basin. With a new push for domestic sources of energy, the government has plans to expand leasing to extract underground coal bed methane, which is a natural gas. This week, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a partial injunction on coal bed methane development in the Powder River Basin. The Court affirmed a lower court ruling that the Bureau of Land Management did not create a sufficiently detailed Environmental Impact Statement; extraction can resume when and if the agency creates a sufficient study. (Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Norton, No. 05-35408 (U.S. Ct. App. 9th Cir., Sept. 11 2007)).
While the government controls the subsurface minerals in the Power River Basin, farmers and ranchers own most of the surface. Environmental problems with coal bed methane extraction include the pollution of rivers with groundwater, the lowering of the water table, and aesthetic harm of wells and machinery on the surface.
The case highlights our nation’s conflicted view of domestic resource production: We prefer to be less reliant on foreign sources of energy, but dislike the land use injuries caused by mineral extractions.
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Land Use Prof Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
- Katherine Dentzman on A Coordinated Approach to Food Safety and Land Use Law at the Urban Fringe
- Jesse Richardson on Local Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing
- Jamie Baker Roskie on Local Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing
- Samuel on Schleicher and Rauch on local regulation of the sharing economy
- Timothy Wayne George on Is Reed v. Town of Gilbert an important sign case?
- Water Down Under: A Report from Australia by Barb Cosens: Post 2: Comparative Water Law: Australia and the western United States or Conversations with Claire
- APA Planning & Law Division's Smith-Babcock-Williams Student Writing Competition now accepting entries
- Jan 30 - Boston U Law - The Iron Triangle of Food Policy - AJLM Symposium
- "Basic Human Right" to Farm Your Lawn?
- CFP: Fordham Law: Sharing Economy, Sharing City: Urban Law and the New Economy