February 6, 2007
Gated developments in the city …
Gated communities: Are they anti-social ogres that reflect clannish fears of the “other”? Or they are simply a privately created response to sophisticated new desires for home and community?
Popular perception typically imagines gated developments in Sun Belt exurbs –- an image that may bring with it baggage of geographic and regional intolerance. But gated developments aren’t just for suburbs of Atlanta and Phoenix any more. They are popping up in unlikely places, as the New York Times recently explored in an interesting article about such a community in Brooklyn, NY. Not only is the new development closed to outsiders, it is also residential-only -– no mixed use, thank you –- and low density. It’s enough to make a new urbanist holler in pain.
I’m uneasy abut the gated development phenomenon, although my worries concern things such as auto-traffic channeling more than they do the over-sold assertions that open neighborhoods engender the embrace of differing social classes and ethnicities. But the allure of suburban-living close to downtown is just as appealing to many families as bringing culture and walkable streets to the suburbs is to others.
February 6, 2007 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Gated developments in the city …:
I can't get to the article (TimesSelect), but if people are moving into urban areas and making a gated suburban oasis, that's just not right. You don't get to tap into all the wonders of urban life but demand that it be on suburban terms. And if that's not what the article was about, by all means, ignore me.
Posted by: the Rising Jurist | Feb 7, 2007 3:37:22 PM