Friday, November 24, 2006

"Progressive" politics succeeds ... except with day laborer centers, of course ...

  How is American land use law adapting to our increasingly diverse and economically stratified populace?  From the recent election results, some would have us believe that Americans have rejected a bias against immigration.  But the "on the ground" details of land use decisions tell aGaithersburg nother story.  Here's a vignette from Montgomery County, Maryland, a Democratic-dominated and affluent suburb of Washington.  Like countless jurisdictions across the nation, the city of Gaithersburg (motto: "Character Counts!") has been looking for a location for an organized center for day laborers (who are most often Latino in Montgomery County) to congregate and get jobs.  But nearly every proposed location generated some local opposition.  Instead of merely imposing this locally unwanted land use on any of a number of potentially appropriate sites, the city has announced that it has given up.  (Here's an editorial of the Washington Post.)  The failure of the local government and the supposedly progressive populace to allow such a simple and important land use shows, yet again, that much of America still prefers social segregation.            

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/land_use/2006/11/progressive_pol.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d834ffff8a69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Progressive" politics succeeds ... except with day laborer centers, of course ...:

Comments

Please see also my response here:

http://gaithersblog.net/2006/11/23/the-washington-post-doesnt-get-it-episode-iii/

as well as some of my prior posts on the topic:

http://gaithersblog.net/category/day-laborers/

It should come as no surprise that the issue is far more complex than the Post tries to make it.

Posted by: gaithersblog | Nov 30, 2006 7:58:28 PM

Post a comment