Monday, October 16, 2006

The "Rationale Razor" ... and the example of farm subsidies ...

   The Washington Post has continued its remarkable series on the faults of the federal farm subsidy program.  Although the system was touted as helping farmers in times of distress, it practice it provides windfalls to many farmers and large profits to a handful of competition-protected insurance companies.  Among the land use implications is the fact that the program encourages farming in areas that are risky and susceptible to floods, droughts, and other hazards, including many stretches of the intensely farmed Great Plains.  The taxpayer is the loser.  Cornfield

    The distortion is an example of what I’ll call law’s “Rationale Razor”:  If a policy CAN be explained by protectionism of a favored group, protectionism likely IS the lawmakers’ motivation for adoption of the policy.  The “Rationale Razor” is a variant, of course, of Occam’s razor, which suggests using the simplest explanation to solving any problem.  It also relates to the Public Choice theory of politics, which suggests that lawmakers are driven my personal benefit (including political gain), just like other economic actors.  While I do not deny that the “public welfare” motivates some policies, the “Rationale Razor” suggest that protectionism should be the presumption.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/land_use/2006/10/the_rationale_r.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d8356b5b1169e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The "Rationale Razor" ... and the example of farm subsidies ...:

Comments