July 18, 2006
Retail size caps ... and the restraints of the Constitution and of demand ...
“Retail Store Size-Cap Ordinances: Legitimate Land Use Regulations or Unconstitutional Economic Protectionism?” is the title of Samford’s Brandon Denning’s cover story in the ABA’s Probate & Property magazine this month. Denning provides a good summary of the law on whether the U.S. Constitution’s dormant commerce clause would prevent local governments from adopting laws barring out-of-state big-box retailers. The sticky question of discerning the motivation behind an ordinance is one key factor.
Although I shake my mind when I think of the idea of discriminating against a business for being based out of state, for some reason I’m not too worried about the effect of a town’s preventing Wal-Mart or Target from moving in. It won’t actually protect the old local Mom-and-Pops, after all; the town’s shoppers will just drive to the next town to find the big discounters, and the local stores will still die. What if the next town passes a similar ordinance? The shoppers will just keep driving until they find their big box; gas at $3 a gallon won’t stop an American in search of a bargain ….
July 18, 2006 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Retail size caps ... and the restraints of the Constitution and of demand ...:
A longer paper by the same author on the same subject can be found at:
Posted by: Kurt Paulsen | Jul 19, 2006 9:46:05 AM