Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Wisconsin Public Union Legislative Battle Is Over

Picketing Not able to wait for the self-exiled Democratic senators to return to Wisconsin--which was looking to happen sooner rather than later--senate Republicans apparently dusted off their rulebooks and figured out how to pass the anti-public union measures without the Democrats. The Republicans removed any provisions related to appropriations from the bill, which also removed the 20-senator quorum requirement for such provisions.  This occurred over objections from the Democratic Assembly leader that the state open meetings law had been violated.  After that, the Senate (18-1) passed the bill.  Next stop is the State Assembly and then Governor, both of which will no doubt approve the bill.

It's a little surprising it took them this long to figure out they could do this or, if they were aware of the option, finally use it.  Given that it looked like the Democrats would come back fairly soon (although this wasn't certain), this move seems to open themselves up to more criticism.  On the other hand, such moves are inside baseball and most of the public attention is focused on the end result more than how they got there.  What remains to be seen is the aftermath to all this.  Will more state limits of public collective bargaining become the norm?  Will the recent events cause a backlash and help rejuvenate labor in some way?  How will changes in the economy and the next election affect things?  Only time will tell.

UPDATE:  Nate Silver at FiveThirtyEight examines some of these questions in a recent post.  It's good to see that he's on this issue because as more polling data becomes available, he'll be able to do more of the great statistical analysis that he's known for.


Labor and Employment News | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wisconsin Public Union Legislative Battle Is Over:


Has it occurred to you that this was a draw play? With the exception of people like porcine propagandist Michael Moore (h/t to James Taranto) and Rachel Madcow leading the charge, the notion that public-sector union bosses enjoy broad public support beyond academia and the moonbatosphere is belied by recent election returns. Perhaps by future election returns, too, when the political process is not warped by forced dues for politics.

Posted by: James Young | Mar 10, 2011 7:57:47 PM

There have been at least a half-dozens polls released over the last couple of weeks that have all shown majority opposition to what Wisconsin is doing. And Walker did not openly run on restricting public unionism, so the previous election results don't seem to say much on this specific point.

Posted by: Jeff Hirsch | Mar 11, 2011 7:57:40 AM

I suppose time will tell, as it usually does. However, I would note that most of these polls use loaded language (i.e., phrasing union monopoly bargaining power as "rights"), and therefore, are suspect. Likewise, it is highly doubtful that either of the groups that each of us respectively hangs out with is even remotely representative on this point.

Posted by: James Young | Mar 14, 2011 12:04:28 PM

Post a comment