Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Blogs Worth Noting

Typing A few weeks ago, we linked to the Kilpatrick Stockton EFCA Update site in a post about the rulemaking petition regarding minority unionsRichard Hankins, of that firm, writes to tell us of the firm's new blog WorkplaceHorizons.  The site not only provides running commentary on labor and employment news and trends, but also provides a "watch list" of proposed legislation -- scroll down the list, clink on the link, and you have an instant update on the status of the proposed legislation.  This is a fantastic resource.

Another blog worth noting (I found this one while perusing WorkplaceHorizons): Evil HR Lady:

Why am I evil? Well, I'm not, but that's the perception of all of us in HR. Need to fire someone? Come to HR. Need to explain to someone why, even after working their rear end off all year, that their annual increase is 2.7%? Come to HR. Need to come up with new mountains of paperwork? Come to HR. So, come join me on the Evil Side. Oh, and send me your HR questions.

rb

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/09/blogs-worth-not.html

About This Blog | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e54eec672a8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blogs Worth Noting:

Comments

Greetings Dr Bales: I've pasted a recent press release that some readers may find interesting concerning public employee pension law.also is posted as a blog on Blogger.com
Please forward this to anyone you think also may be interested in this development. The attorney contact is below, followed by the text of the release and the history of the case in the Missouri Supreme Court. For the text of the case,see Neske, et al. v. City of St. Louis, et al., 218 S.W.3d 417 (Mo. 2007)
Thanks,
Jim

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
For more information, contact:
Daniel Tobben
Danna McKitrick P.C.
(314) 726-1000
dtobben@dmfirm.com
or
Jim Grandone
Grandone Public Relations
(618) 692-1892
grandone@charter.net

CITY PAYS $49 MILLION; JUDGMENT IN
FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION LITIGATION

St. Louis, MO – Sept. 27, 2007 – St. Louis firefighters and retired firefighters can breathe a sigh of relief today after an infusion of more than $49.4 million into their pension fund. The transfer of funds from the city were the result of a Missouri Supreme Court ruling last March in favor of the Firemen’s Retirement System of St. Louis (FRS). The ruling required the City of St. Louis to fully fund the retirement system, according to Dan Tobben, an attorney with Clayton-based law firm Danna McKitrick, who handled the case for FRS.
“We’re very pleased that this matter of funding the firefighter’s pension has come to a successful resolution. It sends a signal to all communities that they either properly fund the pension plans for municipal employees or face grievous consequences,” Tobben said.
In the same opinion, the Supreme Court also ruled in favor of the Police Retirement System (PRS) of St. Louis. See Neske, et al. v. City of St. Louis, et al., 218 S.W.3d 417 (Mo. 2007).
-more-

Firefighters judgement
First and Final Add

As a result of the Supreme Court Judgment, the St. Louis Board of Alderman passed an ordinance to authorize the St. Louis Municipal Finance Corporation to issue up to $155 million in bonds to fund the firefighter, police and municipal retirement systems.
Following the win in the Supreme Court by FRS, the trustees of the retirement system for City employees (ERS), other than police and firefighters, also hired Mr. Tobben to seek recovery from the City for underfunding ERS. ERS will also receive approximately 47 million dollars from the City as a result of this bond issue.
The Supreme Court ruling came as the culmination of a suit, originally filed in 2003, in which a St. Louis City Circuit Court judge ruled in 2005 that the City of St Louis had breached its obligation to pay $18.5 million into the firemen’s pension fund for fiscal years 2004 and 2005.
“Cities in Missouri and Illinois need to follow their state law and municipal ordinances, when it comes to properly funding their employee pension funds. This decision marks the end of the time when city governments could try to use pension funds as piggy banks for other projects,” Tobben said.
# # #


Editor’s Note: About Danna McKitrick: Located in Clayton, Missouri, Danna McKitrick, P.C. delivers outstanding legal representation to businesses (emerging to national), insurers, and individuals throughout the Midwestern region. The firm is on the Web at www.dannamckitrick.com. (Press photo of Mr. Tobben is available at the website).

Historical Background of Neske et al
On March 13, 2007 the Missouri Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Firemen’s Retirement System of St. Louis (FRS) in a lawsuit requiring the City of St. Louis to fully fund FRS, based on the amounts calculated by its actuary. In the same Opinion, the Court also ruled in favor of the Police Retirement System (PRS), which had also filed suit. (Neske, et al. v. City of St. Louis, et al., 218 S.W.3d 417 (Mo. 1007).
The city appealed the trial court’s ruling, citing provisions of the Hancock Amendment to the Missouri Constitution, as well as other constitutional provisions. The trial court noted that the city’s position was unreasonable, stating: “To follow the City’s logic, it could evade almost any debt by failing to timely appropriate money for it in the fiscal year when due, and then claim that it cannot be forced to pay it in succeeding years.” The Supreme Court agreed, holding: “The City cannot evade its responsibilities to the PRS and FRS by refusing to pay them the amounts required and then arguing it has spent the monies elsewhere.”
Much of the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision dealt with whether Hancock Amendment to the State of Missouri’s constitution applied (it does not) and on the definition of the word “shall” and whether it is mandatory or permissive according to the law. In essence, the Court said that “shall” has its normal meaning and the laws mean what they say.
“The statutes and ordinances relating to the PRS and the FRS, when taken as a whole, support the view that actuarial soundness is the principle at the heart of the PRS and the FRS funding provisions. Actuarial soundness requires the City to make its annual contribution of the actuarially-determined amounts certified by the PRS and the FRS boards of trustees.”
Regarding the Hancock Amendment, the Court held that “where there is no mandate that the City take on a new responsibility, but only a continued responsibility for it to fund an existing activity according to a previously existing formula, there is no Hancock violation.” The City did not challenge the accuracy of the actuaries’ calculations or the accuracy of the amount certified by the trustees as the amount to be contributed.
“The firefighter’s pension is critical to the men and women who put their lives on the line to protect the people who live in the City of St. Louis. For many of the firefighters, the pension is all they will have when they retire because most are not eligible for Social Security benefits. Unlike private pensions under ERISA, City firefighters’ pensions are not insured by the federal government. To fail to adequately fund their pension is unconscionable considering these men and women spent their lives protecting the City, its residents and businesses, and their property,” said Tobben, who represented FRS throughout this litigation.
States such as Illinois and New Jersey also are looking for ways to meet their obligations. The New York Times has reported that New Jersey is facing an estimated $18 billion in unfunded pension obligations and that Illinois is stretching its funding obligations because of very severe underfunding. Public officials are being sued and there have been criminal investigations in San Diego for concealing underfunding of city pensions.
“Government cannot continue to treat its employee pension fund obligations like matters subject to discretionary funding. Employees who qualify for a pension deserve better than that,” Tobben said. “The City knew, or should have known, it was obligated to fully fund its pensions. This ruling would not have been necessary if the City had continued to meet its obligation to contribute to the pension funds rather than provoking this litigation.”
# # #
Danna McKitrick is headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. Danna McKitrick, P.C. delivers outstanding legal representation to businesses (emerging to national), insurers, and individuals throughout the Midwestern region. The firm’s Web site is www.dannamckitrick.com. Press photo of Dan Tobben also is available at the website.

Posted by: James Michael Grandone | Oct 1, 2007 10:24:43 PM

The reason this blog exists is that I was unsuccessful in getting the St. Louis Post-Dispatch to find it interesting that the city board of aldermen had to float a $144 million bond to balance the books on their underpaid liability to the firefighters pension fund (as well as the police and other city employees). It would seem that City Hall would rather the millions of taxpayer dollars they just spent be done without the knowledge of the residents who are responsible for those bonds.

Posted by: Jim Grandone | Aug 23, 2008 9:55:46 PM

Post a comment