Saturday, January 27, 2007

Mueting on Recovering Legal Damages for ADA Employment Retaliation

Uiowa An Iowa Law Student, Kate Mueting, has posted her Note in the Iowa Law Review on SSRN: A Clear Path through the Labyrinth: A Case for Allowing Victims of Employment Retaliation and Coercion to Recover Legal Damages under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Here's the abstract:

More than a decade after Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and expanded the remedies available for disability discrimination in employment with the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the Seventh Circuit in Kramer v. Banc of America Securities, 355 F.3d 961 (7th Cir. 2004) became the first federal appellate court to determine that victims of ADA retaliation and coercion in employment are ineligible for legal damages and jury trials.

After detailing the law and analysis implicated by this issue, this Note will assert that, based on the language, structure, and legislative histories of the ADA and the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the Seventh Circuit erred in its approach and conclusion. Furthermore, allowing victims of ADA retaliation and coercion in employment to recover punitive and compensatory damages is necessary to effectively further the ADA's anti-discrimination goals.

Hopefully, this Note will spur courts in future cases in this area of disability discrimination law to  reevaluate the appropriate remedies  for ADA retaliation.

PS

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2007/01/mueting_on_reco.html

Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d8353d2ecb53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mueting on Recovering Legal Damages for ADA Employment Retaliation:

Comments

Post a comment