« Workplace Conflict Resolution | Main | Bibliography on The World of Work and Labor Law »

September 24, 2006

En Banc 9th Circuit Upholds California State Law That Prohibits Employers From Using State Funds for Anti-Union Purposes

Scale_of_justice_8 Via Howard Bashman at How Appealing this past Friday:

"Appeals court restores law favorable to labor": [Friday] in The San Francisco Chronicle, Bob Egelko has an article that begins, "An appeals court reinstated a labor-backed law Thursday that prohibits California employers from spending money they get from the state on anti-union activities. In a 12-3 ruling, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said the law does not violate employers' freedom of speech or interfere with federal regulation of labor-management relations."

Howard provides a link to 9th Circuit's en banc ruling in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO, 03-55166 (9th Cir., 9/21/06) at this link.

Here's the first paragraph of the opinion:

The question before us is whether a state’s exercise of its sovereign power to control the use of its funds conflicts with national labor policy as expressed in the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169. Specifically, two provisions in a California statute forbid employers who receive state grant or program funds in excess of $10,000
from using those funds to assist, promote or deter union organizing. We hold that California’s grant and program fund restrictions do not undermine federal labor policy, are not preempted by the NLRA and do not violate the First Amendment.

PS

September 24, 2006 in Labor Law | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d834eada9c69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference En Banc 9th Circuit Upholds California State Law That Prohibits Employers From Using State Funds for Anti-Union Purposes:

Comments

Please do not overlook the dissent: "Under the guise of preserving state neutrality, the statute operates to impel employers themselves to take a position of neutrality with respect to labor relations, in direct conflict with employers' rights under the First Amendment."
A petition for certiorari will undoubtedly follow. John Raudabaugh; Adjunct Professor of Labor Law; Northwestern University Law School; former Member, NLRB

Posted by: John Raudabaugh | Sep 25, 2006 9:11:47 AM

Post a comment