November 17, 2012
Protecting Judges in Sri Lanka
A United Nations independent expert has voiced serious concerns about reported intimidation and attacks against judges and judicial officers in Sri Lanka, and warned that they might form part of a pattern of attacks, threats, reprisals and interference in the independence of the justice system in the Asian country. “I urge the Sri Lanka Government to take immediate and adequate measures to ensure the physical and mental integrity of members of the judiciary and to allow them to perform their professional duties without any restrictions, improper influences, pressures, threats or interferences, in line with the country’s international human rights obligations,” the UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Gabriela Knaul, said this week in a news release. Click here to see a copy of the news release.
According to reports she has received, most cases of attacks and interference against the judiciary in Sri Lanka are not genuinely investigated, and perpetrators are not held to account. “The irremovability of judges is one of the main pillars guaranteeing the independence of the judiciary and only in exceptional circumstances may this principle be transgressed,” Ms. Knaul said, while also expressing her uneasiness with the procedure of impeachment of the Chief Justice of the country’s Supreme Court, Dr. Bandaranayake, launched before the Parliament on 1 November. “Judges may be dismissed only on serious grounds of misconduct or incompetence, after a procedure that complies with due process and fair trial guarantees and that also provides for an independent review of the decision,” she said. “The misuse of disciplinary proceedings as a reprisals mechanism against independent judges is unacceptable.”
According to media reports, on Wednesday Sri Lanka's Parliament appointed 11 lawmakers to investigate an impeachment motion accusing Chief Justice Bandaranayake of misusing power and having unexplained wealth. She denies wrongdoing, and opposition parties and independent analysts reportedly say the impeachment attempt is aimed at stifling judiciary independence and concentrating power with Sri Lanka's President.
In the Special Rapporteur’s view, according to the news release from the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the procedure for the removal of judges of Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, set out in article 107 of the country’s constitution, allows the Parliament to exercise considerable control over the judiciary – and is therefore incompatible with both the principle of separation of power and article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
“I urge the authorities to reconsider the impeachment of Chief Justice Bandaranayake and ensure that any disciplinary procedure that she might have to undergo is in full compliance with the fundamental principles of due process and fair trial,” the Special Rapporteur added.
(Adapted from a UN Press Release)
November 17, 2012 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Protecting Judges in Sri Lanka:
I firmly believe that one of the integral aspects of any democratic nation is an independent judiciary. It is the judiciary who holds the other parts of government accountable for their actions. An independent judiciary allows a nation to prove its legitimacy.
The Sri Lankan government must take these accusations of threats and intimidation seriously. They must be fully investigated to catch the perpetrators and stop them from this continued attack. The impeachment of the country’s chief justice is especially alarming. If she is removed; it would serve as a warning sign to all the other judges that removal could happen to them-unless they give in to the undue influence.
One of the biggest criticisms of the U.S Constitution is how slow moving the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances makes some of the actions the government would like to take. However, it also ensures that each branch does not become too powerful. Obviously, Sri Lanka’s constitution does not follow that path. Perhaps it is time for the people of Sri Lanka to speak out about their nation and the usurpation of power the President is attempting.
Posted by: Andrew P. | Nov 19, 2012 3:23:32 PM