Thursday, March 5, 2015
Over the course of the last week, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR or Commission) has adopted precautionary measures in two cases - one involving Mexico and the other involving Venezuela.
On February 25, 2015, the Commission requested the adoption of precautionary measures in favor of Norma Mesino Mesino and ten members of her family in Mexico. The request for precautionary measures alleges that Ms. Mesino is allegedly at risk in view of her activities as a human rights defender and her actions taken to solve the murders of her family. After analyzing the allegations of fact and law, the Commission determined that Ms. Mesino and her family are in a serious and urgent situation because her life and personal integrity are at risk. Consequently, in accordance with Article 25 of its Rules of Procedures, the Commission requested the State of Mexico to adopt necessary measures to ensure the life and personal integrity of Norma Mesino Mesino and ten members of her family who are identified within the resolution; to take the necessary measures to ensure that Ms. Mesino continues developing her activities as a human rights defender without being subject to violence and harassment in the exercise of her functions; to agree on the measures to be adopted with Ms. Mesino, her family and their representatives; and to report the actions taken to investigate the events that led to the adoption of this precautionary measure to avoid repetition.
In addition, on March 2, 2015, the Commission decided to request the adoption of precautionary measures in favor of Lorent Saleh and Gerardo Carrero, in Venezuela. The request for precautionary measures alleges that the beneficiaries are at risk because they are allegedly not receiving proper health treatment and they are allegedly in detention conditions that could affect their right to life, health and physical integrity. After analyzing the allegations of fact and law, the Commission determined that Lorent Saleh and Gerardo Carrero are in a serious and urgent situation, since their life and safety are at risk. Consequently, the Comission requested the State of Venezuela to adopt the necessary measures to protect the life and personal integrity of Lorent Saleh and Gerardo Carrero, providing adequate medical treatment for their pathologies; to ensure that the detention conditions of Lorent Saleh and Gerardo Carrero are in accordance with international standards, taking into account their current health status; and to come to an agreement with the beneficiaries and their representatives on the measures to be adopted.
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
The Global Legal Skills conference, in its 10th year, will be held in Chicago, the city of its origin. The Conference began in Chicago at The John Marshall Law School, where it was held three times. It has also traveled to Mexico (twice), to Costa Rica (twice), to Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, D.C., and most recently to the University of Verona Faculty of Law in Verona, Italy.
This year’s conference (GLS 10) will be held at The John Marshall Law School for the first two days and will be hosted at Northwestern University School of Law for its final day. The two schools are within walking distance and are also served by subway line
The first call for proposals for presentations has already closed and acceptance messages are going out to those who submitted. This is the second call for presenters. Proposals should be for a 25-minute presentation (for one or two people) or an interactive group panel presentation (no more than four panelists) of 75-minutes (including audience participation).
The conference audience will include legal writing professionals, international and comparative law professors, clinical professors and others involved in skills education, law school administrators, law librarians, and ESL/EFL professors and scholars. Also attending will be faculty members teaching general law subjects with a transnational or international component. Attendees have also included judges, lawyers, court translators, and others involved in international and transnational law. Attendees come from around the world, and as many as 35 countries have been represented in past conferences.
Please submit a proposal on any aspect of Global Legal Skills, including experiential learning, distance education, comparative law, international law, course design and materials, teaching methods, and opportunities for teaching abroad and in the United States. However, because the conference focuses on legal skills for a global audience, please tailor your proposal accordingly.
The schedule for GLS 10 will allow for professional networking opportunities and development and also a chance to take in the many sites (and excellent restaurants!) Chicago has to offer. Chicago is served by two airports, O’Hare and Midway, making travel to the city easy. The timing of the conference (the week before Memorial Day weekend) is intended to allow you to spend extra time exploring Chicago and its environs at a time when the temperatures are moderate and the skies are clear.
This is a self-funded academic conference, and as in past years, presenters will be asked to pay the registration fee of $225.00. A small number of need-based scholarships will also be available, especially for participants from outside the United States. Additional tickets for family members and friends will also be available for the walking tour, law school reception, and Union League Club Gala Dinner. Chicago in the springtime is a great travel destination for families where they can enjoy Millennium Park, two world class zoos, and the amazing Museum Campus.
You may submit more than one proposal but because of high demand for speaking slots you will only be allowed to speak on one panel.
Please send program proposals to GLS10Chicago@gmail.com. You can also send a copy to Lurene Contento (Program Chair of GLS 10). Her email is 9Content@jmls.edu.
Please include “GLS 10 Proposal” in the subject line. Then, list the names and institutional affiliations of presenters, the title of your presentation, a brief summary of your presentation, the format you would prefer (25 minutes or 75 minutes), and the target audience.
You will find travel information and more conference information on the GLS website, glsc.jmls.edu/2015. Additional proposals will be accepted through April 15 if additional speaking slots are available.
Spanish Language CLE Proposals
You may also submit proposals for CLE presentations in Spanish. A Spanish-language CLE track will include sessions for attorneys, law students, and court translators. Persons submitting proposals for presentations in Spanish may also submit a proposal in English as an exception to the single presentation rule. Proposals are sought on topics such as “Introduction to Mexican Law,” “Understanding the Amparo,” and “Latin American Corporation Law.”
Scholars’ Forum (Tues. May 19, 2015)
A one-day scholars’ forum is also planned for May 19th, the day before the GLS conference begins. Participation in this forum will be limited to 16 persons and will include special sessions on international legal research as well as the presentation of papers and works-in-progress. For more information about the Scholars’ Forum, send an email to Prof. Mark E. Wojcik at email@example.com with the title of your proposed work. Registration for the scholars’ forum is at this link: http://events.jmls.edu/registration/node/677
We hope to see you in Chicago this May for the 10th anniversary of the Global Legal Skills Conference!
Prof. Mark E. Wojcik, Chair, Global Legal Skills Conference
Prof. Lurene Contento, Chair GLS 10 Program Committee, The John Marshall Law School
Yesterday, the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) brought charges against two new suspects in only the third and fourth cases to be heard by the tribunal. The ECCC announced that former Khmer Rouge navy chief Meas Muth and former district commander Im Chaem have been charged in abstentia with murder and crimes against humanity, including enslavement, extermination and other inhumane acts, as well as grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions. For more information, visit the ECCC website.
The London Centre of International Law Practice (LCILP) is sponsoring a one-day conference on International Sanctions: Legal, Policy and Business Challenges at Arundel House in Central London on 19 March 2015. The conference will bring together experts from academia, international organizations and legal practice to consider issues relating to the proliferation of UN sanctions programs. More information about the conference can be found here.
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR or Commission) filed an application with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Court) against Peru with respect to Luis Williams Pollo Rivera.
The case concerns a series of human rights violations committed against Luis Pollo during the time he was in State custody for the crime of terrorism. Specifically, the Commission concluded that Mr. Pollo's detention was illegal and arbitrary, that it had been imposed without judicial oversight, that Mr. Pollo was subjected to torture, and that the conditions under which he was detained were cruel and inhumane. The IACHR also found that Peru had arbitrarily interfered with Mr. Pollo's home during a raid. In addition, the Commission deemed that, under the applicable legal framework, Mr. Pollo was kept from filing a habeas corpus petition. Furthermore, the Commission concluded that the prosecution of Mr. Pollo for the crimes of treason and terrorism violated numerous due process guarantees.
In its Merits Report on the case, the Commission concluded that the State of Peru is responsible for violating Luis Pollo’s rights to humane treatment and personal liberty; to a fair trial; to freedom from ex post facto laws; to protection of honor, dignity, and private and family life; and to judicial protection. Moreover, the Commission indicated that the State is responsible for violating its obligations to prevent and punish torture. Finally, the Commission considered the State responsible for violating the right to humane treatment of the victim’s next of kin.
The Commission submitted Mr. Pollo's case to the Court because it deemed that Peru had not complied with the recommendations contained in the Commission’s Merits Report. In that report, the Commission recommended that Peru make adequate reparations for the human rights violations found by the Commission, in the form of both pecuniary and moral damages, including just compensation for the victim’s next of kin and implementation of psychological support for them. In addition, the Commission recommended that the State conduct an impartial and effective investigation, within a reasonable period of time, to fully clarify the acts constituting violations of the American Convention. It also recommended that the State identify the perpetrators and masterminds and impose the appropriate punishments, and that it order the necessary administrative, disciplinary, or criminal measures for the actions or omissions of State officials who were instrumental in denying the victims justice and in allowing the violations involved in this case to go unpunished. The Commission also asked the State to adopt the necessary measures to avoid a recurrence of similar acts in the future. Specifically, it asked the State to implement permanent programs in human rights and international humanitarian law in the training academies of the Peruvian National Police Force and the Armed Forces. In addition, the IACHR asked the State to adopt the necessary measures so that health professionals are able to freely exercise their professional duties in Peru, in keeping with applicable international standards, and to publish the Commission’s report in the Official Newspaper or another newspaper with national circulation.
Monday, March 2, 2015
The Following Bills Have Been Introduced in the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives
S Res 87 (Menendez, D-NJ), to express the sense of the Senate regarding the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe and to encourage greater cooperation with the European governments, the European Union, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe in preventing and responding to anti-Semitism; to Foreign Relations. CR 2/25/15, S1118.
HR 1150 (Smith, R-NJ), to amend the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to improve the ability of the United States to advance religious freedom globally through enhanced diplomacy, training, counterterrorism, and foreign assistance efforts, and through stronger and more flexible political responses to religious freedom violations and violent extremism worldwide; to Foreign Affairs, Financial Services, and Oversight and Government Reform. CR 2/27/15, H1498.
HR 1159 (Smith, R-NJ), to reinstate reporting requirements related to United States-Hong Kong relations; to Foreign Affairs. CR 2/27/15, H1498.
H Res 130 (Hastings, D-FL), to express the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe and to encourage greater cooperation with the European governments, the European Union, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe in preventing and responding to anti-Semitism; to Foreign Affairs. CR 2/27/15, H1500. CR 2/27/15, H1499.
S 615 (Corker, R-TN), to provide for congressional review and oversight of agreements relating to Iran's nuclear program; to Foreign Relations. CR 2/27/15, H1201.
On 2/27/15, the House Foreign Affairs Committee approved HR 757, the North Korea Sanctions Enforcement Act of 2015.
Hat tip to the ABA Governmental Affairs Office
Obviously the first conference was not a disaster because they're doing it again.
“Bridging the Collaborative Gap”
September 25-27, 2015
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Call for Presentations
Earthquakes and tsunamis. Development-induced displacement. Armed conflict, terrorism, and human trafficking. Fifty-one million recognized refugees worldwide. Securitization, deportation, and criminalization regimes. Climate change and environmental chaos. Humanitarianism, human rights, and international criminal prosecutions. The quest for peace and justice. The age of the anthropocene. The world has no shortage of problems and possibilities associated with disasters, displacement and human rights. And they are not just academic.
The University of Tennessee issues a call for presentations for its second conference in Disasters, Displacement, and Human Rights (DDHR). The 2015 conference theme is “Bridging the Collaborative Gap.” Collaborations within anthropology and across disciplines are increasingly vital for understanding the complexity of disasters, displacement, and human rights issues today. In both local settings and across the globe, from the distant past to anticipations of the future, communities of diverse experiences and aspirations directly confront the problems that preoccupy academic researchers. The 2015 DDHR conference aims to problematize and foster the practice of collaboration among academic disciplines and with DDHR-affected communities.
The organizers encourage the participation of researchers, practitioners, and students who address the broad themes of disasters, displacement and human rights from a range of perspectives, time periods, and contexts. We especially seek contributions from international researchers and practitioners who exemplify collaboration and/or cross-training within and/or outside of anthropology. Finally, they solicit the participation of members of affected communities, especially those who have worked closely with anthropologists and other researchers and professionals.
Abstract submissions of no more than 250 words are invited for individual paper and poster presentations. We also invite abstracts for panel submissions and roundtables, which should include a 250-word abstract for the panel or roundtable theme and the names of participants with titles and brief (100 word) descriptions of presentations. Suggested topics include but are not limited to:
- - Development and development forced displacement and resettlement (DFDR)
- - Migration, detention, and deportation
- - Refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced people
- - Climate change and the anthropocene
- - Natural and anthropogenic disasters
- - Torture, human trafficking, and other human rights violations
- - Transitional Justice and other alternative justice models
- - International human rights law and practice
- - Critical humanitarianism
- - Policy, politics, and international relations
- - Peace and conflict
Hat tip to Jonathan Todres
Congratulations to the team from University College Cork (UCC), who won the Irish national rounds of the Jessup moot court competition this weekend! As the "President" of the International Court of Justice in the final round, I had the honor of presenting the trophy to the winning team. All of the competitors were outstanding and deserve high praise for their poise and persuasive legal arguments. Thanks also go to the Irish Law Society for being such great hosts for the competition.
Recently, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR or Commission) filed an application with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (the Court) alleging that Ecuador had failed to fulfill its obligations in investigating the death of Luis Jorge Valencia Hinojosa (Luis Valencia), a police officer who was killed in the context of a law enforcement operation. Specifically, the IACHR concluded that the criminal investigation was not carried out in a reasonable period of time, and the use of the police criminal justice system constituted a failure to recognize the right to an independent and impartial judge. In addition, the investigation was not carried out with due diligence, despite evidence indicating that those responsible for the death had been the police officers conducting the operation. In particular, the IACHR determined that the State did not take sufficient steps to clarify whether Luis Valencia's death was a suicide or an extrajudicial execution.
The IACHR also determined that Luis Valencia’s death was attributable to the State of Ecuador because the official investigation carried out was incompatible with the American Convention and there was no State response to explain what had happened. Specifically, the Commission considered that a lack of regulation, planning, and oversight led to an environment ripe for the improper and excessive use of force. Moreover, the Commission concluded that the police officers exercised deadly force in a way that was unnecessary and disproportionate, because they did not have a legal framework regarding the use of force in police operations. The Commission stated that the available evidence indicated that the death could have been caused by a shot fired by one of the police officers during the operation. The IACHR also found that, even under a theory of suicide, the deliberate use of deadly force to “intimidate” Luis Valencia could have caused him to be fearful and frightened, which could have been determining factors in his eventual decision to end his life. As a result, the Commission determined that, in either of the two scenarios, the actions of the State agents were incompatible with the obligations derived from the right to life.
In its Admissibility and Merits Report on the case, the IACHR concluded that the right to life of Luis Valencia had been violated, as had the rights of his widow, Patricia Alexandra Trujillo Esparza, to a fair trial, to judicial protection, and to humane treatment. The Commission submitted the case to the Inter-American Court because the Commission deemed that Ecuador had not complied with the recommendations contained in the Commission’s Merits Report. In that report, the IACHR recommended that the State of Ecuador conduct a complete and effective investigation into the human rights violations found by the Commission; provide adequate reparation for these violations, both in the material and moral sense; and adopt legislative, administrative, and other measures to ensure that the use of force by agents of the State is compatible with the standards described in the report.
According to an IACHR press release, "this case will enable the Inter-American Court to expand its case law on the use of force by security agents of the State, specifically as it relates to preventive actions and those taken when force is used. In addition, the Court will be able to express its opinion on the minimum standards of diligence that an investigation must meet. Finally, the Court will be able to delve into the evidential implications, in international human rights law, in cases in which there are indications of arbitrary use of force and in which the State fails to conduct a proper investigation."
Sunday, March 1, 2015
The early bird deadline for the ABA Section of International Law Spring Meeting expires March 16, 2015.
The 2015 Spring Meeting will be held in the beautiful and historic city of Washington, DC from April 28 - May 2, 2015. Join over 1,200 leading attorneys, corporate counsel, government officials, academics and NGO lawyers for four days of networking and programming on the latest international legal and ethics issues. On Tuesday, you can also attend a special workshop at the Law Library of Congress.
The 2015 Spring Meeting will offer you:
- Cutting edge programming and an entire year's worth of CLE including nearly 70 substantive concurrent panel sessions that will cover themes including: Business, Disputes, Energy/Environment, Intellectual Property, Law Practice and Human Rights.
- Opportunities to learn from top legal experts and hear from world class speakers including: Bill Browder, Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of Hermitage Capital Management; International Court of Justice Judge Joan Donoghue; and United States Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
- Networking opportunities with thought leaders and experts, policy makers, key international enforcers, decision makers and international leaders in the law.
Save on your registration by taking advantage of early bird rates before March 16th! Registration rates are further discounted for young lawyers (35 years and under), full time government and NGO employees, academics, law students, corporate counsel, solo / small practice and retired attorneys, and members of the ABA Section of International Law and cooperating entities (like the American Branch of the International Law Association, for example).
Hat tip to Houston Putnam Lowry of the American Branch of the International Law Association (ABILA)
The sponsors of International Law Weekend 2015 (ILW 2015) invite proposals for panels, roundtables, and lectures. ILW 2015 is scheduled to be held on November 5-7, 2015, in New York City.
ILW is sponsored and organized by the American Branch of the International Law Association (ABILA) – which welcomes new members from academia, the practicing bar, and the diplomatic world – and the International Law Students Association (ILSA). This annual conference attracts an audience of more than eight hundred academics, diplomats, members of the governmental and nongovernmental sectors, and foreign policy and law students.
Call for Proposals
The unifying theme for ILW 2015 is Global Problems, Legal Solutions: Challenges for Contemporary International Lawyers.
ILW 2015 will explore the many roles that international law plays in addressing global challenges. The aim is to provide an opportunity for discussion and debate about the ways in which international law provides fundamental tools and mechanisms to address emerging global issues. ILW 2015 will offer engaging panels on current problems and innovative solutions in both public and private international law.
The ILW Organizing Committee invites proposals to be submitted online on or before Friday, March 20, 2015 by clicking here to use the ILW Panel Proposal Submission Form.
Panel proposals may concern any aspect of contemporary international law and practice, including:
- international arbitration,
- international environmental law,
- national security,
- cyber law,
- use of force,
- human rights and humanitarian law,
- international organizations,
- international criminal law,
- international intellectual property,
- the law of the sea,
- space law,and
- transnational commercial and trade law.
When submitting your proposal, please identify the primary areas of international law that your proposed panel will address. We also ask that you provide a brief description of the topic, and the names, titles, and affiliations of the chair and likely speakers. One of the objectives of ILW 2015 is to promote new dialogues among scholars and practicing lawyers, so all panels should include presenters with diverse experiences and perspectives.
On the submission form, you will be asked to describe what you think would be the most engaging and exciting format for your proposed program. The organizers encourage suggestions of varied formats, such as debates, roundtables, lectures, and break-out groups, as well as the usual practice of panel presentations. Additionally, they encourage you to consider taking the necessary steps to qualify your panel for CLE credit. They hope to offer at least seven panels qualifying for CLE.
ILW 2015 is scheduled to be held at 42 West 44th Street on Thursday evening, November 5, and at Fordham Law School at Lincoln Center on November 6-7, 2015. The ABILA Annual meeting will also be held during ILW 2015 at the same location.
The audience will include practitioners, academics, UN diplomats, business leaders, federal and state government officials, NGO leaders, writers, journalists, and interested citizens. We plan to have a broad array of both public international law and private international law topics in each program timeslot. For questions regarding ILW 2015, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
2015 ILW Program Committee Members
- Chiara Giorgetti, Assistant Professor of Law Faculty Director, LLM Program Richmond School of Law
- David P. Stewart, President, ABILA, Georgetown University Law Center
- Santiago Villalpando, Acting Chief, Treaty Section, Office of Legal Affairs United Nations
- Jeremy Sharpe, Chief of Investment Arbitration Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State
- Tessa Walker, Programs Director, ILSA
Hat tip to David Stewart
Russian opposition politician Boris Nemtsov (Бори́с Ефи́мович Немцо́в) was assassinated on February 27 in central Moscow by unknown assailants.
A spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon stated and that Mr. Ban expected the perpetrators to be brought to justice. The Secretary-General also expressed his deepest condolences to Mr. Nemtsov's family, friends and supporters.
Saturday, February 28, 2015
UNAIDS has kicked off the 2015 global edition of Zero Discrimination Day as part of the Organization's wider effort to spur solidarity towards ending discrimination. This year's theme Open Up, Reach Out encourages all members of the international community to unite under the banner of diversity and celebrate each other's difference in an authoritative rejection of discrimination in all its forms.
Zero Discrimination Day, observed annually on 1 March, draws attention to the millions who still suffer from social and economic exclusion due to prejudice and intolerance. Millions of women and girls in every region of the world, for instance, experience violence and abuse on a daily basis and struggle to access adequate health care and education.
Almost 80 countries still have laws criminalizing same-sex sexual relations while some 38 countries, territories, and areas impose some form of restriction on the entry, stay and residence of people living with HIV. Furthermore, legal and social environments are still failing to address stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV and those most vulnerable to HIV infection.
UNAIDS estimated that 35 million people globally were living with HIV in 2013, while 2.1 million people became newly infected with the virus and 1.5 million people died from AIDS-related illnesses.
“Some of the world's most challenging problems can be solved simply by eliminating stigma and discrimination,” said Michel Sidibé, Executive Director of UNAIDS. “As we collectively strive for a fairer world we can be encouraged by the enthusiasm for achieving zero discrimination.”
The UN day will be marked by a number of events held around the world, with photo exhibitions in China, dancing in Gabon, concerts in Madagascar, a storytelling event for children in Mongolia and special film screenings in Nepal.
(adapted from a UN press release)
The Executive Office of the President of the United States announced the continuation of the national emergency with respect to Cuba. FR11075
Hat tip to the ABA Governmental Affairs Office.
The Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific of the U.S. House of Repesentatives Foreign Affairs Committee will hold a hearing on expanding trade opportunities under the Trans-Pacific Partnership on March 4, 2015 at 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Room 2172 of the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington, D.C.
Hat tip to the ABA Governmental Affairs Office.
The Foreign Affairs Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives will hold a hearing on relations between the U.S. and Ukraine on March 4, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Room 2172 of the Rayburn House Office Building in Washington D.C.
Hat tip to the ABA Governmental Affairs Office.
Thursday, February 26, 2015
News from the University of Lausanne's Centre for Comparative, European, and International Law (CDCEI)
LL.M. in International and European Economic and Commercial Law (Master of Advanced Studies): Registration now open for programmes starting in the Fall 2015 and the Spring 2016
The programme is for those who are interested in trade, investment, Intellectual Property, Competition, or Arbitration. Graduates work in leading law firms, international organizations, Government, NGOs, and multinational enterprises around the world. The programme is entirely taught in English, can be either taken full-time of part-time, and benefits from its location close to the headquarters of many international organizations, international law firms, and global companies in the Lake Geneva region of Switzerland. More information can be found by clicking here.
The 77th Biennial Conference of the International Law Association will take place from August 7- 11, 2016 in Johannesburg, South Africa. The theme will be 'International Law and State Practice: Is there a North/South Divide?' The official conference website address is www.ila2016.com and you can already register your interest in the conference. Further information and programme details will be added as and when they become available.
Hat tip to the South African Branch of the International Law Association (SABILA)
In this latest development in the long-running saga between the United States (US) and European Union (EU) over subsidies provided to large commercial aircraft companies, the World Trade Organization (WTO) has established a dispute resolution panel to hear the EU's latest complaint regarding allegedly improper tax incentives provided by the U.S. State of Washington to a large commercial aircraft carrier (i.e., Boeing). The EU invoked the "fast track" procedures available under the Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM) Agreement, alleging that the conditional tax incentives constitute a prohibited subsidy under that Agreement. The matter is referred to as US-Conditional Tax Incentives for Large Civil Aircraft (DS487).
In other WTO news, the WTO Dispute Resolution Body elected a new Chair - Ambassador Harald Neple of Norway.
For more information regarding other recent WTO activities relating to dispute resolution matters, visit the WTO website.
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
The Board of Editors of Trade, Law and Development [TL&D] is inviting original, unpublished manuscripts for publication in the Winter 2015 Issue of the Journal (Vol. 7, No. 2). The manuscripts may be in the form of Articles, Notes, Comments, and Book Reviews.
All manuscripts received by September 15, 2015, pertaining to any area within the purview of international economic law, will be reviewed by the editorial board for publication in the Winter 2015 issue.
TL&D aims to generate and sustain a democratic debate on emerging issues in international economic law, with a special focus on the developing world. Towards these ends, we have published works by noted scholars such as Prof. Petros Mavroidis, Prof. Mitsuo Matsuhita, Prof. Raj Bhala, Prof. Joel Trachtman, Gabrielle Marceau, Simon Lester, Prof. Bryan Mercurio, Prof. E.U. Petersmann and Prof. M. Sornarajah among others. TL&D also has the distinction of being ranked the best journal in India across all fields of law for three consecutive years and the 10th best trade journal worldwide by Washington and Lee University, School of Law [The Washington & Lee Rankings are considered to be the most comprehensive in this regard].
For more information, please go through the submission guidelines available at TL&D.