Tuesday, April 19, 2016

U.S. v. Texas – TRUE OR FALSE? By Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia

Shoba_wadhia_faculty2

U.S. v. Texas – TRUE OR FALSE?

By Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia

April 19, 2016

On Monday, April 18 the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of U.S. v. Texas. The 108 page transcript from the arguments included colorful (predictable?) exchanges between eight Supreme Court justices and the lawyers- U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli who represented the Administration; Thomas Saenz, supporting undocumented mothers of children who are U.S. citizens; Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller, arguing for the states; and Erin Murphy, representing the U.S. House of Representatives against the Administration. Here I offer a short “True or False” exam – call it a prelude to the final exams in the coming weeks that my colleagues and I will proctor on the complex topic of immigration law. Highlighting this complexity is Justice Alito who at the oral arguments remarked, “And how is it possible to lawfully work in the United States without lawfully being in the United States…I’m just talking about the English Language. I just don’t understand it.” (p. 28)

True or False?

SG KELLER: “But here, with deferred action they’ve only --- the Executive has only been granting 500-1000 deferred action permits a year.” (p.48)

ANSWER: False: Deferred action enjoys a long history that pre-dates President Obama’s Administration. As detailed here, thousands have applied for and received deferred action for largely humanitarian reasons. As eloquently told by SG Verrilli during the oral arguments in describing the recipients of the President’s deferred action programs: “This class of aliens is the lowest priority. And there is a pressing humanitarian concern in avoiding the break up families that contain U.S. citizen children.” (p. 3)

 

SG KELLER: “That lawful presence phrase is key because that’s the first time in a deferred action program the Executive has taken that position.” (p. 51)

ANSWER: False. For far more years than the life of this lawsuit, the Administration has taken the position that persons in deferred action will not accrue “unlawful presence” and will be treated as “lawfully present.” Perhaps more importantly, “lawful presence” is not the same thing as “lawful status” -- not even close. This point has been highlighted in many places including a letter by 104 law professors in reaction to this lawsuit. “The lawful presence awarded to deferred action recipients is a modest aspect of deferred action with its own statutory basis. The limited significance of unlawful presence is that it determines whether the person’s presence will trigger future inadmissibility when he or she departs. In contrast, lawful status, which neither DAPA nor DACA would grant, is associated with whether a person’s status is secure or liminal.”

 

JUSTICE KAGAN: [I]t seems to me your real gripe here--- and you—maybe it’s a real gripe your real grip here is to the work authorization piece the benefits pieces, is that right? (p. 53)

ANSWER: True. But this gripe has no legal or historical home. The statute and regulations that govern employment for certain prosecutorial discretion beneficiaries are clear and unexceptional. This article describes how work authorization has enabled hundreds of thousands of individuals with prosecutorial discretion to apply for work authorization under the regulation promulgated in 1987. Beyond those who have applied for employment pursuant to a prosecutorial discretion grant, SG Verrelli describes how additional categories of noncitizens have applied for and received work authorization pending an application an adjustment of status or relief under cancellation of removal, highlighting the different categories of people who receive work authorization. (p. 29-31) Perhaps this prompted Justice Kagan to argue “But then it seems to me …what you should be attacking is not DAPA. What you should be attacking is the work authorization regulations that DHS, or before that the INA, has had for 30 years.” (p. 55).

KJ

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2016/04/us-v-texas-true-or-false-by-shoba-sivaprasad-wadhia.html

| Permalink

Comments

Great to know about USA vs. Texas. Thanks for sharing this awesome one.

Posted by: Maisha | May 2, 2016 8:03:09 AM

thanks for information, i like this your post

PulsaTop Pulsa Otomatis Via Paypal 24 Jam Terpercaya

Posted by: imay | May 7, 2016 11:46:26 PM

This is information better for me

Posted by: QNC Jelly Gamat | May 19, 2016 3:25:18 AM

thanks for share, very nice your post

Posted by: mecan | May 30, 2016 11:48:43 AM

Here you can get latest exam questions of AWS Solution Architect Associate Dumps. We provide you real exam questions along with an updated software Test Engine. We assure you will pass your exam in first attempt. 100% passing guarantee. 100% money back guarantee. Visit us for more info and latest exam questions.
AWS Solutions Architect Associate Exam Questions

Posted by: Samuel | Jun 27, 2016 8:55:09 PM

I visited several web pages but this is great page..

Posted by: clash royale triche | Jul 3, 2016 9:08:42 AM

nice post. Good information and thanks for sharing

Posted by: klik disini | Jul 13, 2016 9:05:18 PM

Presently Amazondumps.us AWS-Solution-Architect-Associate study materials for help you take care of this issue. Our AWS-Solution-Architect-Associate exam guides covers all test extent. Can help you in a brief while pass the AWS-Solution-Architect-Associate examination .

AWS Solution Architect Associate Exam Engine


Posted by: harry | Dec 2, 2016 3:28:36 AM

Here you can get the latest AWS Solution Architect exam questions associated with Dumps. We provide the actual test questions as well as an up-to-date test engine software. We assure you that you will pass your exam on the first try. 100% passing guarantee. 100% money back guarantee. Visit us for more information and the latest exam questions.

AWS Solution Architect Exam

Posted by: eric | Dec 2, 2016 3:31:18 AM

really nice piece of information there. worth reading it.

Posted by: clash royale astuce triche | Apr 5, 2017 6:11:25 PM

Nice Info Thanks for share wth me

Posted by: Syarat Membuat NPWP | Aug 15, 2017 8:42:27 PM

NIce Post, U can Visit My Site Too

Posted by: npwp online | Sep 4, 2017 12:09:44 AM


Good article, I've seen many articles today, but only this article is of interest to me, thanks poker online

Posted by: sinidomino | Sep 4, 2017 3:01:39 AM

I'm going to be a law student by next year, so excited!!! Thank you for the post :D

Posted by: Donna Bella | Sep 11, 2017 11:55:17 PM

Post a comment