Friday, May 3, 2013

Practice Advisory on Moncrieffe v. Holder

From the Legal Action Center:

LAC Releases Practice Advisory on Moncrieffe v. Holder and its Implications
for Drug Charges and Other Issues Involving the Categorical Approach

Washington, D.C.—Last week, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Moncrieffe v. Holder, holding that a state drug conviction is not an aggravated felony when the statute of conviction extends to the social sharing of a small amount of marijuana.  The case has important implications not only for noncitizens charged with drug trafficking, but also for the application of the categorical approach in immigration proceedings.

Yesterday, the Legal Action Center, the Immigrant Defense Project, and the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild issued a Practice Advisory, “Moncrieffe v. Holder: Implications for Drug Charges and Other Issues Involving the Categorical Approach.”  The advisory discusses the holding of the case, the decision’s potentially broader implications, strategies for representing noncitizen criminal defendants, and steps that lawyers should take immediately in pending or already concluded removal proceedings affected by Moncrieffe.

bh

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2013/05/practice-advisory-on-moncrieffe-v-holder.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01901bcd4f0d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Practice Advisory on Moncrieffe v. Holder: