« Call to Investigate Agriprocessors | Main | MALDEF Joined United Farm Workers March In Memory of 17-Year-Old Deceased Farm Worker »

June 9, 2008

Commentary on Postville Raid

I want to thank Kevin and Bill for asking me to join the Immigration Prof Blog. As my first post, I include my reaction to the Postville raids, which has been published an op ed.

Immigration Raids Lead U.S. to a Moral, Legal Crisis

By Raquel Aldana

Postville, Iowa has been turned into a ghost town. Nearly a third of its residents, mostly undocumented workers from Guatemala and Mexico, sit in jail convicted of identity crimes or awaiting deportation. Hundreds more hide in fear. Their children, too scared to go to school, have left the town's classrooms nearly empty. For this, Postville should thank their local police, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE), and a failed immigration policy.

Aided by local law enforcement, ICE arrested 389 workers during the largest single-site immigration raid in U.S. history at the Postville meatpacking plant, the area's major employer. In an unprecedented move, ICE criminally charged 302 of these workers with aggravated ID theft and/or using false social security numbers. Within days, ICE resolved their fate: 297 men and women pled guilty and were sentenced to prison and subsequent deportation. Only a few await criminal trials or immigration hearings.

Postville is one of the latest in a series of immigration raids that have intensified in the past three years. These raids are leading our nation to a moral, legal and humanitarian crisis.

ICE's heavy handed enforcement against undocumented workers in the wake of failed immigration reform is shameful. Under current immigration laws, no more than 10,000 of the backlogged visas for unskilled workers and 66,000 temporary visas for seasonal workers are available each year. In contrast, an estimated 2,000 persons cross the Southwest border into the U.S. daily and an estimated 12 million undocumented persons live in the U.S.

Global economic realities push willing workers out of their nations, where they have no means to earn even a subsistence living and pull them into low wage jobs in the U.S., where the lack of labor protection leaves them vulnerable to exploitation. U.S. employers and we as consumers benefit from their cheap labor, but these workers and their families bear the brunt of a broken immigration system.

Few employers face civil and criminal sanctions for violating immigration and labor laws. So far, no one from Postville plant has been charged despite overwhelming evidence that the company helped workers procure false documents, paid substandard wages, failed to pay overtime, and seriously mistreated its workers. All the while, Congress continues to kill proposals granting even temporary legal status to agricultural workers, while doling out large subsidies to U.S. farmers without regard to their effect on future migration of rural workers from developing nations into the U.S.

Legally speaking, ICE and federal prosecutors overstepped their powers when they criminally charged the workers. Congress specifically exempted from prosecution workers who use false Social Security numbers to engage in otherwise lawful conduct, such as to procure jobs.

This unprecedented criminalization of undocumented workers also has not been accompanied by a comparable infusion of constitutional guarantees in the handling of these cases. ICE conducted the investigation leading to the Postville raid with easy access to immigration databases and employee documents. ICE then executed the raid with easily-procured administrative, not criminal, warrants.

Thus, the protection of stricter Fourth Amendment search and seizure, Fifth Amendment due process, and Sixth Amendment right to counsel constitutional guarantees available to most criminal defendants were unavailable to these workers. Nearly all waived any rights they might have had under extreme prosecutorial pressure. The uncharacteristic speed and efficiency of the Postville raid left workers without adequate opportunity to consult with defense counsel, and none or few had access to immigration lawyers to learn about the immigration consequences of their pleas.

The involvement of local law enforcement in these raids is also worrisome. Distrust of police keeps many immigrants from reporting crime. This increases their vulnerability as victims. Moreover, the drain on limited resources from these additional responsibilities on local police takes away from their primary duties as community caretakers.

The courts must be vigilant in protecting the rights of workers and their families and insist on stricter constitutional guarantees when criminal charges are involved.

These raids should be halted immediately. The prospect of future raids should certainly create a sense of urgency for the U.S. to adopt immigration policies that allows employers to hire migrant workers, and include strong labor protections that offer a path to legalization for workers and their families. If workers are legal, we are all better off.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aldana is a board member of the Society of American Law Teachers and a professor of law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Law.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright (C) 2008 by the American Forum. 6/08

ra

June 9, 2008 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5532cd7ee8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Commentary on Postville Raid :

Comments

Here's a fun question: if we could wave a magic wand and end current and future illegal immigration, would the author still have something to whine about?

I'm going to assume most would agree.

Is the authors assumed solution of "reform" going to really end illegal immigration? Of course not.

So, there appears to be a bit of a conflict; let us know when - through thinking things through as hard as you can - that's been resolved.

Posted by: TLB | Jun 9, 2008 6:32:00 PM

"Congress specifically exempted from prosecution workers who use false Social Security numbers to engage in otherwise lawful conduct, such as to procure jobs."

Prosecuted for fake SSNs? More distortions. It's my understanding that these people were charged with identity theft, a form of fraud, the prosecution for which was never waived by Congress. Where's the justice for the millions of Americans inconvenienced by identity theft caused by illegal aliens every year?

Posted by: Horace | Jun 9, 2008 6:57:28 PM

Welcome to the board, ra.

'These raids should be halted immediately.'

Categorically? How about if the aliens are not criminally charged? All your criminal procedure concerns are then inapplicable.

We could even go a step further. How about if prosecution is *solely* against the illegal hirers? Would you go for that? It would be more efficient to not apply procedural processes to so many people--just go after the real villains and negate their unfair advantage over those who play by the legal hiring and worker condition rules.

'The prospect of future raids should certainly create a sense of urgency for the U.S. to adopt immigration policies that allows employers to hire migrant workers'

Do you think creating that sense of urgency is their motivation? John Bowe:

'One thing that was postulated was that the federal government wants to increase the number of guest workers, so raids like this help make the feds' case stronger. We currently have something like 29,000 guest workers, and the Bush administration wants to change this by increasing the guest worker program to 500,000 and as many as 700,000 workers. In fact, they are in the process of trying to do this by changing the Department of Labor rules, so they don't have to go through Congress.'

http://www.iowaindependent.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2447


'and include strong labor protections'

Why would they do that? That would negate what illegal hirers like about illegal labor. If those interests make sure visas will forever resemble the 'close to slavery'

http://www.splcenter.org/legal/guestreport/index.jsp

of H2A/B, do you still go along with just expanding such programs?
Even if there were improvements in the law, do you really think it would be enforced? The side with the lobbying power likes things one-sided in their favor regardless of what the law supposedly mandates. The current protections have never been enforced. What will suddenly change that makes you comfortable with a radical expansion?

Posted by: Jack | Jun 10, 2008 8:44:04 AM

Though I have absolutely zero sympathy for Horace or the position he regularly puts forward here, and am generally sympathetic to the position of the post I wanted as well to ask about this bit:

"Legally speaking, ICE and federal prosecutors overstepped their powers when they criminally charged the workers. Congress specifically exempted from prosecution workers who use false Social Security numbers to engage in otherwise lawful conduct, such as to procure jobs."

I have not followed this case extremely closely, simply reading some of the articles that have been newspapers and the like. My understanding was that the people arrested were charged with using the social security numbers of other people- real social security numbers, that is, not made up ones, to apply for the jobs. In itself I'm not especially worried about this, especially if no other use of the SSN was made. The prosecutions seem unreasonably punitive to me as well. But I'm curious about the law cited here- is this about using actual SSNs that belong to other people or about making up false SSNs? From your wording it sounds a bit like the latter but since these workers were charged with identity theft I guess they were using real SSNs that belonged to someone else. Was _this_ supposed to be made legal, and if so how would it fit with laws against identity theft? I'm genuinely curious to know here as I'd like to know what the law is.

Posted by: Matt Lister | Jun 10, 2008 9:44:19 AM

Is this the first time you've noted the exaggerations and lies of the illegal alien advocates, Matt? You must have forgotten you mind numbing meds today.

Posted by: Horace | Jun 10, 2008 6:50:17 PM

Horace, after your remarks about "thousands of people being killed every day" by illegal immigrants and other wildly inaccurate claims I think you ought to worry about the beam in your eye before you start complaining about the mote in others'.

Posted by: Matt Lister | Jun 10, 2008 9:25:59 PM


Under 42 U.S.C. Sec, 408, which deals with penalties for the misuse of social security numbers -- as I recall using false or someone else's SSN, subsections (e)(1)(A)(2004) expressly exempted from prosecution or penalties persons who were the recipients of amnesty under IRCA or adjustment of status or who become special immigrants. Congress intended this exemption sepcifically to apply to individauls who used a false social security number to "engage in otherwise lawful conuct.," according to H.R. Conf. Rep. no. 101-964, at 948 (1990). The report provides specific examples of the type of conduct that should be exempt. "an alien who used a false security number in order: 2. to obtain employment which results in eligibility for social security benefits or the receipt of wage credits would be considered exept from prosecution." Id.

The point here is that Congress has in the past exempted undocumented workers from prosecution for using false social security numbers to procure jobs, and there is no reason why that policy should change today in a climate when Congress has been considering comprehensive immigration reform and where no specific legislation has been passed suggesting to DHS that its shift to prosecutions to go after undocumented workers is the will of Congress.

Posted by: ra | Jun 11, 2008 12:56:45 AM

Thanks for the further clarification RA- I appreciate it.

Posted by: Matt Lister | Jun 11, 2008 7:08:19 AM

I'm guessing that your back on you meds again, Matt, as you've seemed to have accepted Raquel Aldana's response without further question. Yes, Matt, RA-1 is actually the author, duh! Yes, Ms. Aldana is blowing smoke up your butt, as the laws she refers to pertain to the earlier amnesty and are not in force for subsequent offences. Anyway, the laws do not apply to those who are guilty of stealing identities, only those who use false SSNs, ones not associated with an actual person. The women is just practicing the usual obfuscations and distortions as the rest of the advocates. She should know better as she purports to be an attorney. Honesty isn't a strong suit of illegal alien advocates. It's one reason that they lack credibility with the public in general.

Posted by: Horace | Jun 11, 2008 6:48:47 PM

Post a comment