Friday, March 28, 2008

Nevada AG Opines that State Immigration Bill Preempted by Federal Law

The Nevada Attorney General, Catherine Cortez Masto, has issued an opinion that a proposed  immigration bill would be premepted by federal law:

"IRCA preempts state laws imposing civil or criminal sanctions, but does not preempt "licensing or similar laws." The "administrative fine" imposed by [Nevada] A.B. 383 is a "civil sanction" which is both expressly and impliedly preempted by federal law. It is not a licensing or "fitness to do business" law because the Tax Commission has no other authority to act against an employer's business license for immigration-related matters. Therefore, it is an attempt to impose an additional state sanction on certain businesses that violate the federal law, which is expressly preempted. A.B. 383 also conflicts with the comprehensive federal scheme, which already sets maximum monetary sanctions for violations of IRCA."

KJ

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2008/03/nevada-ag-opine.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5517d085a8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nevada AG Opines that State Immigration Bill Preempted by Federal Law:

Comments