« LAPD Accused of Using Excessive Force Against Immigration Marchers -- and Reporters (On Video) | Main | Secretary Chertoff Extends Temporary Protected Status for Eligible Hondurans, Nicaraguans and Salvadorans »
May 2, 2007
Wall Street Journal on Immigration Reform
The Wall Street Journal ran this editorial in response to yesterday's immigration marches:
Yesterday's May Day immigration demonstrations dominated cable TV, but they were more sound than substance. The bigger news is the recent Journal report that illegal border crossings have slowed by more than 10% this year. The Bush Administration credits stepped-up enforcement, but our guess is that the cause is mostly labor supply and demand.
A slump in the housing market has resulted in fewer jobs in the building trades, which are increasingly filled by Latino immigrants. With fewer jobs available, fewer immigrants are headed north. It's another example of the market's ability to determine how much foreign labor our economy needs. It also indicates that immigrants come here primarily to work, not to idle and collect welfare.
We'd like to think these economic realities will inform any legislation produced this year. Based on the selective leaks from Capitol Hill, it's hard to know what kind of "reforms" Congress is cooking up. But smoke from the backroom suggests that the status quo might be preferable to some of the proposed bipartisan compromises. Given that illegal immigration is caused above all by a worker shortage for certain types of jobs in the U.S., any reform that doesn't take into account labor-market needs won't solve the problem and risks making matters worse.
Unfortunately, the immigration draft proposal recently circulated by the Bush Administration all but ignores the economic factors that drive illegal immigration. Aside from that, the proposal is unduly restrictive and thus probably unworkable.
Its anti-family provisions would end the ability of U.S. citizens to sponsor their parents, children and siblings for immigration. In addition to departing from U.S. tradition, this would have a damaging impact on immigrant entrepreneurs, who typically rely on relatives -- think of your dry cleaner or the corner bodega -- to help run their small businesses. It's also a startling about-face for President Bush, who promised immigration reforms that would "encourage family reunification" and repeatedly has said that "family values don't stop at the Rio Grande."
As for dealing with the estimated 12 million illegal aliens already here, the White House is bowing to GOP restrictionists. To gain legal status, an immigrant would have to pay $3,500 in fines and fees for a three-year visa. He could renew the visa once, for another three years (and another $3,500). To get permanent legal residency, he'd have to return to his home country and pay an additional $10,000 fine to re-enter the U.S. (if and when the application is approved). Click here for access to the rest of the editorial.
May 2, 2007 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wall Street Journal on Immigration Reform:
» Immigration, Family Unity, and International Law from Opinio Juris
Yesterday's immigrant demonstrations were predictably smaller than last year's, given the diminished risk that something really bad will come out of Congress at this point (remember, the House had passed a bill making presence in violation of the immig... [Read More]
Tracked on May 2, 2007 2:36:35 PM
'Given that illegal immigration is caused above all by a worker shortage for certain types of jobs in the U.S.'
Illegal immigration (of workers) is caused by disparity between wages in the U.S. and the home country + LACK of labor demand in the home country. It's more about what's NOT happening in, e.g., Mexico than some supposedly huge shortage in the U.S.
Posted by: Jack | May 3, 2007 5:05:26 PM