HealthLawProf Blog

Editor: Katharine Van Tassel
Creighton University School of Law

Monday, July 27, 2015

Payments to Egg "Donors"

Interesting article in today’s Wall Street Journal about a lawsuit over limits on payments by fertility clinics to women who supply eggs for infertile couples. Under influential, though not mandatory, guidelines issued by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, payments to egg “donors” above $5,000 “require justification,” and payments greater than $10,000 “are not appropriate.” (When I was in the Indiana legislature, a statute was passed limiting payments to $4,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses.)

In one view, payment caps are needed to “prevent coercion and exploitation in the egg-donation process.” But one also can view the guidelines as an “illegal conspiracy to set prices in violation of antitrust laws.” More to come in a case that could go to trial next year. 

In the meantime, there are other important concerns about payments for eggs and the costs to infertile persons. As with other assisted reproductive treatments, insurers generally do not cover those costs. This encourages the infertile to seek multiple births in one treatment cycle rather than single births over multiple treatment cycles, which puts mothers and their infants at greater risks to health. In addition, lack of coverage leaves treatment unaffordable for many of the infertile. As I have argued elsewhere (here and here), social policy treats infertile persons unfairly when coverage is denied for assisted reproductive services.

[cross-posted at Bill of Health and orentlicher.tumblr.com]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/healthlawprof_blog/2015/07/interesting-article-in-todays-wall-street-journal-about-a-lawsuit-over-limits-on-payments-by-fertility-clinics-to-women-wh.html

Health Care Costs, Insurance | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment