HealthLawProf Blog

Editor: Katharine Van Tassel
Concordia University School of Law

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Judge to Unseal Documents on the Eli Lilly Drug Zyprexa

The New York Times reports that a federal judge in Brooklyn decided on Friday to unseal confidential materials about Eli Lilly's top-selling antipsychotic drug Zyprexa, citing “the health of hundreds of thousands of people” and “fundamental questions” about the way drugs are approved for new uses.  Mary WIlliams Walsh writes,

ZyprexaThe decision by Judge Jack B. Weinstein of Federal District Court came as part of a ruling that gave class-action status to a case brought by insurance companies, pension funds and unions that want Lilly to repay them billions of dollars they spent on the drug. They contend that Lilly hid the side effects of the drug and marketed it for unapproved uses.

The confidential documents were produced by Lilly in response to a related lawsuit filed by patients who said that Zyprexa had caused excessive weight gain and diabetes. The papers were placed under a protective court order soon after the suit was filed in 2004.

“Lilly’s legitimate interest in confidentiality does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure at this stage,” Judge Weinstein wrote.

A spokeswoman for Lilly, Marni Lemons, said the company would not appeal the decision to make the documents public but that it would appeal the judge’s certification of a class action.

The issue of confidential information arose in 2006, when some of the Zyprexa papers were provided to a reporter for The New York Times, Alex Berenson. He wrote front-page articles based on evidence they contained that Lilly executives had kept information from doctors about Zyprexa’s links to obesity and high blood sugar.

Eli Lilly denied having withheld such information and said that the documents Mr. Berenson had seen were “cherry-picked” to give a one-sided view.

The publication of sealed information led Judge Weinstein to issue a sharply worded ruling last year, stating that Mr. Berenson had engaged in a conspiracy with a doctor and a lawyer and that they had used others “as their agents in crime.”

The judge said the sealed documents belonged to Lilly and ordered the doctor, David S. Egilman, and the lawyer, James B. Gottstein, to return them. Dr. Egilman had been serving as an expert consultant for the plaintiffs at the time, and Mr. Gottstein was working on Zyprexa litigation in Alaska.

Since then, insurance companies, unions, medical researchers and other publications have filed formal requests for copies of the documents. Many of the papers were entered into open court proceedings in Alaska, and copies of some have been posted on the Internet.

In his ruling on Friday, Judge Weinstein repeated that the information had been “obtained illegally” by The Times but also cited “this country’s general policy of accessibility of court records.”

Dr. Egilman said on Friday that he felt vindicated.

“The public can now decide for itself what these documents stand for,” he said.

Mr. Gottstein said he still disputed Judge Weinstein’s rulings that he had obtained the documents illegally.

“I think I did get them properly,” he said, adding that the new order unsealed only a small number of the Zyprexa documents that Lilly has provided to the court. “There are a lot of other documents that are hidden.”

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Judge to Unseal Documents on the Eli Lilly Drug Zyprexa :


Zyprexa has generated a lot of bad press for Eli Lilly and they still have unresolved Zyprexa settlement claims.
Eli Lilly is 'reaping the whirlwind' for aggressive marketing of Zyprexa that has caused suffering and deaths.
Zyprexa is being avoided by doctors they aren't prescribing it for new patients at all anymore.
Daniel Haszard Zyprexa patient who got diabetes from it.

Posted by: Daniel Haszard | Sep 7, 2008 2:20:53 AM

This case is a bogus attack on clinical care by the criminal cult enterprise that is the lawyer profession. A competitor of a drug company, a vile, left wing lawyer, indoctrinated at Harvard Law school, has facilities that treat patients without medication. He attacks his competitor with pretextual litigationl. The cult criminal on the bench see coerces the drug company to pay, to settle.

Can a lawyer use litigation to attack a competitor? Can the lawyer fail to inform the judge of the case of such a conflict of interest? If the vile cult criminal on the bench allows the case to proceed, should there be an investigation of the cult criminal by the Justice Department office that investigates official corruption?

This vile left wing ideologue lawyer seeks to impose his sick bias against medication upon the entire nation. This vile cult criminal on the bench is allowing it.

There is not a shred of supporting evidence in the decision from facts, law or logic. It is just cult criminal bias, imposed on the public at the point of a gun. And the public will pay for every penny in the form of higher prices or decreased access to medication.

Untreated paranoid schizophrenics kill 1000 times a year. It would be beautiful justice if a medication free paranoid patient were to kill the judge or the owner of the medication free treatment facility.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Sep 7, 2008 3:15:23 PM

Post a comment