HealthLawProf Blog

Editor: Katharine Van Tassel
Akron Univ. School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Tragic Transplant Payment Denial

Many of you may be aware of the recent actions by CIGNA health insurance to deny payment for a liver transplant to Nataline Sarkisyan.  I am linking to one recent discussion of the incident.   I still have not figured out all the facts but it is surely a terrible case if the media's accounts are accurate.  Christy Hardin Smith at Firedoglake writes,

Insurance companies make money by finding ways to not pay claims. That's the truth of it.   This past week, we sadly saw the result of this in the death of Nataline Sarkisyan.  From the CA Nurses Association:

On Dec. 11, four leading physicians, including the surgical director of the Pediatric Liver Transplant Program at UCLA, wrote to CIGNA urging the company to reverse its denial. The physicians said that Nataline “currently meets criteria to be listed as Status 1A” for a transplant. They also challenged CIGNA’s denial which the company said occurred because their benefit plan “does not cover experimental, investigational and unproven services,” to which the doctors replied, “Nataline’s case is in fact none of the above.”

The CA Nurses Assoc. organized a massive protest against Cigna's spreadsheet-based decision, but the turnaround from Cigna came too late for Nataline, who passed away without ever receiving her transplant. C&L has news video on the story, and it is absolutely heartbreaking.

I keep thinking about this poor girl's parents, having already gone through so much with their child who battled and survived cancer only to face this latest hurdle, to be told by doctors -- including the head of pediatric transplant surgery at UCLA -- that she had at least a 65% chance of surviving six months or more with a liver transplant...and then be told by their for-profit insurers that they wouldn't pay to save their child's life.   Death by spreadsheet and profit margin, indeed.  All Spin Zone lays it out (via RawStory):

AP/AR is is business shorthand for “accounts payable / accounts receiveable”. In theory, as long as AR > AP on the corporate ledger, a company is profitable and satisfies the needs of its stakeholders (business partners, customers, vendors, employees, and stockholders). So, most large companies employ teams of individuals who manage corporate risk. Guidelines and protocols are established to enable these teams to make decisions on when it makes economic sense to spend money, approve projects, and invest in research and development.

It’s all about risk management. Keep this in mind as you read further — because you are a risk, not a client — to your healthcare, life, auto, and homeowners insurance providers....

The conflict between medical treatment needs and the corporate bottom line happens in a whole lot of medical cases. In the abstract, you can see why this happens. . . .

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/healthlawprof_blog/2007/12/tragic-transpla.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e54fc20a4e8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tragic Transplant Payment Denial:

Comments

Post a comment