Tuesday, August 12, 2014

CFP: Feminist Judgments: Rewriting SCOTUS Opinions

The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project seeks contributors of revised opinions and commentary for an edited collection entitled Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court.  This edited volume is a collaborative project among feminist law professors and others to rewrite, from a feminist perspective, key Supreme Court decisions relevant to gender issues.  Editors Kathy Stanchi, Linda Berger and Bridget Crawford seek prospective authors for 20 to 25 rewritten Supreme Court opinions covering a range of topics including reproductive rights, equal protection, the state’s use of criminal power, privacy, the family, women’s political participation, Title IX, employment discrimination and substantive due process.  The editors also seek authors for commentaries of 1,500 to 2,500 words to put into context each of the rewritten cases. 

 

The U.S. Feminist Judgments project was inspired by the successful collection and publication in Britain of Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice, edited by Rosemary Hunter, Clare McGlynn, and Erika Rackley. This volume, which included feminist versions of twenty-three key British decisions from the Court of Appeal and House of Lords, was published in 2010 and has been very well received. Like the sister project in Britain, the U.S. Feminist Judgments Project endeavors to pioneer “a new form of critical socio-legal scholarship” that illustrates how cases could have been decided differently had a feminist method been employed. We believe that U.S. Supreme Court law is ripe for this kind of scholarly treatment.

 

            Those who are interested in rewriting an opinion or providing the commentary on one of the rewritten opinions should fill out an application here:

            https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/feministjudgments

Applications are due by September 15, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. eastern.  Editors will notify accepted authors and commentators by October 7, 2014.  First drafts of rewritten opinions will be due on February 1, 2015.  First drafts of comments on the rewritten opinions will be due on March 15, 2015.  The editors are in the process of identifying a publisher; publication of the final volume is anticipated for late 2015.

 

            A list of cases tentatively scheduled for rewriting is available here:             http://www.law.temple.edu/pdfs/faculty/FeministJudgmentsSurveyResults.pdf

Applicants may indicate their preferences among the list of cases.  Applicants also may suggest other cases for rewriting.  The tentative cases were chosen with the input and advice of an Advisory Panel of distinguished U.S. scholars including Kathryn Abrams, Katharine Bartlett, Devon Carbado, Mary Anne Case, Erwin Chemerinsky, April Cherry, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Martha Fineman, Margaret Johnson, Sonia Katyal, Nancy Leong, Catharine MacKinnon, Rachel Moran, Melissa Murray, Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Nancy Polikoff, Dorothy Roberts, Dan Rodriguez, Susan Ross, Vicki Schultz, Dean Spade, Robin West, and Verna Williams.

 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/gender_law/2014/08/cfp-feminist-judgments-rewriting-scotus-opinions.html

Call for Papers, Violence Against Women | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment