« Bee Movie is about food litigation! | Main | Farm Policy a cause of obesity? »
November 6, 2007
The Case for Real Food
From the New York Times Nov. 5, 2007:
Is there more to a carrot than beta carotene? Is lycopene the best we get from tomatoes? And when we heap our plates with salmon, are we serving up something other than omega-3s?
For years the scientific community has viewed individual vitamins and nutrients as the best that food has to offer. Nutrition studies have isolated beta carotene, calcium, vitamin E and lycopene, among other nutrients, in order to study their health benefits in the body.
But now, after several vitamin studies have produced disappointing results, there’s a growing belief that food is more than just a sum of its nutrient parts. In a recent commentary for the journal Nutrition Reviews, University of Minnesota professor of epidemiology David R. Jacobs argues that nutrition researchers should focus on whole foods rather than only on single nutrients. “We argue for a need to return to food as the source of nutrition knowledge,'’ writes Dr. Jacobs with co-author Linda C. Tapsell, a nutrition researcher at the University of Wollongong in Australia.
November 6, 2007 in nutrition policy | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/89778/23097746
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Case for Real Food:



