Family Law Prof Blog

Editor: Margaret Ryznar
Indiana University
Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Monday, December 20, 2010

Godsoe: "All in the Family: Towards a New Representational Model for Parents and Children"

Cynthia Godsoe (Brooklyn Law School) has recently posted All in the Family: Towards a New Representational Model for Parents and Children, Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics (forthcoming) on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

The presumption that parents act in their children’s interests governs both daily life and legal doctrine. This Article demonstrates that this presumption, while usually correct, is problematic when unquestioned because it masks any conflict between parents and children, and is at odds with the individualistic framework of the ethical rules governing attorneys. This harms families and puts attorneys at risk. This Article explores this representation problem in the previously largely ignored context of special education for children with disabilities. The Supreme Court, in Winkelman v. Parma City School District, recently established that parents and children each have substantive yet “intertwined” rights to a child’s appropriate education. Nonetheless, courts and attorneys continue to assume that parents speak for children, even in cases with a high risk of conflict. 

To best serve families and protect attorneys, this Article proposes a novel reconception of representation in education cases. Family representation posits the family as the client, with the attorney owing duties to each member individually and as part of the group. A family representation framework brings four real-world benefits: (1) it recognizes the interconnected nature of the relationships and rights of parents and children; (2) it engages both parties in the process, particularly important for children who have previously been overlooked; (3) it is economical, increasing the number of represented parties but not the number of attorneys; and (4) it brings attorney practice into accord with ethical standards. This model has ramifications beyond the educational sphere as it could also be fruitfully applied in torts and benefits actions by a parent and child against the state or other third party. Ultimately, reconceiving the attorney’s role as representing the family while respecting the voices of each member harmonizes the competing principles of individual autonomy and family unity to the benefit of parents, children and attorneys.


Scholarship, Family Law | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Godsoe: "All in the Family: Towards a New Representational Model for Parents and Children":


As a family attorney, not only will I say no to this notion, but I will go several steps further and say heck way. Family law attorneys already have to put up with a lot of baggage. Let us not add to it by asking the attorney to create an education-like corrobative environment.

Posted by: Divorce Tulsa | Dec 25, 2010 10:50:21 PM

Post a comment