« What’s in a Name? | Main | New Adultery Lingo, Thanks to Tiger Woods and Jesse James »
April 12, 2010
Job Commitment and Recent Motherhood Mutually Exclusive?
This story suggests to avoid job interviewing while
pregnant, a disappointing contention. From the London Evening Standard:
A City law firm was today hit by
fresh accusations of sexism.
The claims came from a former senior lawyer at
Eversheds who spoke out after a colleague's email asked how a job applicant who
had recently given birth could be questioned on her “commitment”.
Stewart Shackleton, 51, who was co-head of the international arbitration group, resigned in a dispute linked to the email last month. Today he claimed the firm ordered a secret investigation into the woman's background when she applied for the job, while carrying out no checks on male rivals.
Mr Shackleton also said it was “inaccurate” for the
firm to claim it had investigated and dealt with the email from Stuart Dutson
“swiftly and decisively”. In fact, the issues remained unresolved when he quit
the firm on 26 January, he said.
It was revealed that Mr Dutson had emailed Mr Shackleton and a colleague last June to ask: “This lady has recently had a child. Are there any guidelines on how we can ask questions properly designed to identify her commitment, hours she is prepared to do, how she will balance work and a child?”
Read the rest here.
MR
April 12, 2010 in Current Affairs | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a90c2e83970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Job Commitment and Recent Motherhood Mutually Exclusive?:
Comments
It sounds like the firm was concerned about FMLA issues.
Posted by: Tulsa Divorce Lawyers | Sep 17, 2011 3:22:32 PM
