Saturday, January 16, 2010

Dauvergne & Millbank: "Forced Marriage as a Harm in Domestic and International Law"

Catherine Dauvergne (University of British Columbia Faculty of Law) and Jenni Millbank (University of Technology, Sydney) have posted "Forced Marriage as a Harm in Domestic and International Law" on SSRN.  Read the abstract here:

This article reports on our analysis of 120 refugee cases from Australia, Canada, and Britain where an actual or threatened forced marriage was part of the claim for protection. We found that forced marriage was rarely considered by refugee decision makers to be a harm in and of itself. This finding contributes to understanding how gender and sexuality are analysed within refugee law, because the harm of forced marriage is experienced differently by lesbians, gay men and heterosexual women. We contrast our findings in the refugee case law with domestic initiatives in Europe aimed at protecting nationals from forced marriages both within Europe and elsewhere. We pay particular attention to British initiatives because they are in many ways the most far-reaching and innovative, and thus the contrast with the response of British refugee law is all the more stark.

AC

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/family_law/2010/01/catherine-dauvergne-university-of-british-columbia-faculty-of-law-and-jenni-millbank-university-of-technology-sydney-hav.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef012876cbd70e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dauvergne & Millbank: "Forced Marriage as a Harm in Domestic and International Law":

Comments

Post a comment