Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Turkheimer: "Forfeiture after Giles: the relevance of 'domestic violence context'"

Deborah Tuerkheimer (DePaul University College of Law) has published "Forfeiture after Giles: the relevance of 'domestic violence context'." 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 711-731 (2009).  Here is the abstract from SSRN:

This contribution to Lewis and Clark's symposium issue on California v. Giles contemplates the future of domestic violence prosecution in a period of uncertainty. Giles, the United States Supreme Court’s most recent pronouncement impacting the prosecution of domestic violence, has exposed deep judicial ambivalence about the newly transformed Confrontation Clause. This Article endeavors to guide lower courts in the task of implementation and to chart a course for the evolution of prosecutorial treatment of battering, concluding that Giles represents a significant opportunity for those concerned about the constraints Crawford v. Washington and Davis v. Washington had seemed to place on the prosecution of abuse. For the first time, the Court has identified "the domestic violence context" as a relevant construct, thereby compelling lower courts to grapple with the particularities of violence between intimates. This is a remarkable shift in relatively short order, and it allows us to glimpse the possibility of a jurisprudence informed by the realities of battering.

AC

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/family_law/2009/12/turkheimer-forfeiture-after-giles-the-relevance-of-domestic-violence-context.html

Domestic Violence | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef012876583904970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Turkheimer: "Forfeiture after Giles: the relevance of 'domestic violence context'":

Comments

Post a comment