Sunday, July 23, 2006

Case Law Development: Juvenile Court Has No Jurisdiction over Missing Child

After a Mother had four other children removed due to severe child abuse (including the death of one of her children), Mother gave birth to a fifth child and reported that she had given the child to his father, whose whereabouts she did not knwo.  The state brought proceedings to bring this fifth child under court jurisdiction, denied Mother family reunification services, identified long-term foster care as a permanent plan, and ordered permanent placement services for the child if he were ever found.  On appeal, the California Court of Appeals reversed, holding that in the absence of any evidence regarding the child's whereabouts, the state had failed to establish jurisdiction.  The court suggested that the trial court should have simply waited until the child was found to hold the jurisdicitonal and dispositional hearings.  The court remanded with instructions that the juvenile court maintain the protective custody warrant issued for Baby Boy M. in full force and effect and set the case for periodic review hearings.

In re Baby Boy M, (Cal. Ct. App. July 19, 2006)
Opinion on web (Last visited July 23, 2006)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/family_law/2006/07/case_law_develo_8.html

Child Abuse | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d835309eb653ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Case Law Development: Juvenile Court Has No Jurisdiction over Missing Child:

Comments

http://www.change.org/petitions/request-to-investigate-indio-california-family-courts

Posted by: mak | Oct 12, 2011 5:59:47 PM

Post a comment