EvidenceProf Blog

Editor: Colin Miller
Univ. of South Carolina School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, January 25, 2010

GVR In Brsicoe: Supreme Court Keeps Confrontation Clause Framework Intact In Briscoe v. Virginia

I have written a couple of posts on this blog (here and here) about Brsicoe v. Virginia, which I called a "potentially landmark Confrontation Clause case in the latter post. I had thought that the Supreme Court, with a new Justice since Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts was decided, might have overturned that opinion, fleshed out the definition of "testimonial," or blown up the whole Confrontation Clause framework and started again at zero. Instead, here was the Court's holding today:

PER CURIAM.

We vacate the judgment of the Supreme Court of Virginia and remand the case for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. ___ (2009)

It is so ordered.

This is what is known as a grant, vacate, and remand (a/k/a GVR), and it means that the status quo remains the status quo in the Confrontation Clause arena.

-CM

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/evidenceprof/2010/01/i-have-written-a-couple-of-posts-on-this-bloghere-and-here-about-brsicoe-v-virginia-which-i-called-a-potentially-landmark.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a80c55c5970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference GVR In Brsicoe: Supreme Court Keeps Confrontation Clause Framework Intact In Briscoe v. Virginia:

Comments

Post a comment