« Liar, Liar: Court Of Appeals Of Texas Opinion Reveals Impairment/Disability Impeachment Exception | Main | Can I Get A Receipt For That?: Court Of Appeals Of Minnesota Finds Best Evidence Rule Not Violated By Testimony Regarding Receipt Not Offered To Prove Its Contents »
October 6, 2009
Stupid Human Tricks: Halderman's Attorney Claims Evidence Of David Letterman's Sexual Harrassment Will Be Admissible At His Client's Attempted Grand Larceny Trial
I'm sure that by now most readers have heard about the alleged attempt by longtime 48 Hours Mystery producer Robert "Joe" Halderman to extort money from David Letterman. Basically, the state contends that the extortion began with Halderman "dropping off, in Letterman's limousine, a purported screenplay outline about a talk-show host who is brought down by an affair, as well as copies of sections of [Stephanie] Birkitt's diaries." And the state contends that it ended with Letterman giving Halderman a fake $2 million check at the behest of the Manhattan D.A.'s office and Halderman being busted when he tried to deposit the check at the bank. Halderman was subsequent charged with attempted grand larceny in the first degree under New York Penal Law Sections 110 and 155.42. Now, Halderman's attorney, Gerald Shargel, claims that he has evidence of Letterman's sexual harassment of his staff members, which he plans to "shar[e] in the courtroom," and some attorneys claim that the evidence could indeed be admissible. I don't see how.
Let's start with the basics. Halderman is charged with attempted grand larceny in the first degree. New York Penal Law Section 155.42 states that
A person is guilty of grand larceny in the first degree when he steals property and when the value of the property exceeds one million dollars.
A person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime when, with intent to commit a crime, he engages in conduct which tends to effect the commission of such crime.
It is the state of mind coupled with the actions of the defendant which are significant. To require that a defendant must actually achieve his criminal aim would be to undercut the usefulness of the attempt statute, dealing as it does with criminal enterprises before they reach fruition....The actual causing of fear in the mind of the victim should not be a required element of the crime of attempted extortion.
Some criminal lawyers said Monday that issue would likely be fought over before a trial, and a judge could rule the specifics of Mr. Letterman’s behavior irrelevant to the charge of extortion. But the lawyers also said that the risk that such details could be brought out in court might be enough to compel Mr. Letterman to ask the district attorney to look for ways to avoid a trial.“It could foreseeably be admissible,” said Gerald Lefcourt, a defense attorney with experience with both criminal and celebrity cases. He said the court could decide to hear the defendant’s explanation that he intended to write a true story in a screenplay and went to Mr. Letterman to see if he would pay to avoid that.
October 6, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Stupid Human Tricks: Halderman's Attorney Claims Evidence Of David Letterman's Sexual Harrassment Will Be Admissible At His Client's Attempted Grand Larceny Trial :