Monday, September 3, 2012

And Not a Drop to Drink: Should the BP Oil Spill Case be Decided Under Admiralty Law?

2010_-_BP_Deepwater_Horizon_Disaster_-_deepwaterhorizondisaster.com

The BP oil spill case is being handled as an admiralty tort. My colleague, Professor John Costonis, questions whether this is the correct body of law under which to decide the case. In his article (recently posted on SSRN), And Not a Drop to Drink: Admiralty Law and the BP Well Blowout, Costonis makes some compelling arguments that admiralty law in fact is not the correct body of law under which to handle BP claims. Though Deepwater Horizon was a vessel, did the spill actually occur from the vessel? Unlike Exxon Valdez, the oil came from a very different source. Nearly 5 million barrels emanated from the Outer-continental Shelf seabed, which, as Costonis notes, is "denominated by OCSLA as an exclusive federal enclave and a component of the nation's public lands." Contrast this amount with the small amount of oil that actually emanated from the "vessel," which was only 45/10,000ths of the total discharge. 

Due to these and other distinctions between the BP disaster and previous admiralty and oil spill cases, Costonis argues that the BP suit should be decided as a matter of environmental law under OCSLA and OPA, with liability and damages attaching per those statutory schemes under principles of "polluter pays." Furthermore, Costonis notes a broader issue that implicates questions of both judicial discretion in applying the law as well as institutional integrity. It seems the Fifth Circuit is predisposed to decide cases under admiralty law, maintaining what Costonis calls a "reflexive embrace of admiralty." In the end, Costonis makes a strong argument that institutional inertia is not a good justification for misapplying the law.

- Blake Hudson

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/environmental_law/2012/09/and-not-a-drop-to-drink.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017c31a26d98970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference And Not a Drop to Drink: Should the BP Oil Spill Case be Decided Under Admiralty Law?:

Comments

Blake,

OPA, a strict liability statute, governs the MDL 2179 cases alleging economic loss due to the BP oil spill. The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act ("OCSLA") governs the MDL 2179 personal injury and wrongful death actions and borrows the law of the adjacent state as surrogate federal law.

Direct links to relevant motions:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/103033267/BP-Oil-Spill-Deepwater-Horizon-Economic-and-Property-Damages-Class-Action-Settlement-Motion-to-Vacate-Preliminary-Approval-Order

http://www.scribd.com/doc/103033798/MDL-2179-Motion-to-Vacate-Preliminary-Approval-Order-As-to-the-Proposed-Economic-and-Property-Damages-Class-Action-Settlement-Rec-Doc-6418-dated

http://www.scribd.com/doc/89826458/BP-Oil-Spill-Trial-MDL-2179-Motion-to-Vacate-B1-Order-Memo-of-Law

Sincerely,
Brian J. Donovan

The Donovan Law Group
3102 Seaway Ct., Suite 304
Tampa, FL 33629
Cell: (352)328-7469
http://donovanlawgroup.wordpress.com/

Posted by: Brian J. Donovan | Sep 16, 2012 9:27:58 AM

Post a comment