« Barack Obama and Faith in Politics |
| More expert commentary on Exxon Valdez -- Sturley on vicarious liability »
February 29, 2008
Expert commentary on the Exxon Valdez Argument -- Prof. Amy Wildermuth on the Court's "affinity for the trinity"
Professor Amy Wildermuth, University of Utah, worked on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in the Exxon case and has offered these extensive comments on the argument. Wildermuth reaction
In sum, her commentary agrees with my conclusion that the Court is quite interested in a possible limit of two-to-one--"an affinity for the trinity" that she asserts can be traced back to prior cases. She points out, however, that no common law court has ever adopted that kind of ratio limit; instead, it has been exclusively legislatures that have adopted such limits. She also raises the interesting question of whether the base for any such ratio might be reevaluated in light of Justice Kennedy's citation of the general criminal statute that uses "gross loss" as its base.
February 29, 2008 in Biodiversity, Cases, Climate Change, Constitutional Law, Economics, Energy, Governance/Management, Law | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Expert commentary on the Exxon Valdez Argument -- Prof. Amy Wildermuth on the Court's "affinity for the trinity":