Monday, June 19, 2006

Forest Guardians Protect Informal Consultation

Findlaw link: Forest Guardians

Many years ago, I represented ASARCO in Cabinet Mountains Wilderness.  We established a precedent that if, after a biological assessment, the agency modified its proposed federal action to avoid adverse impacts on a listed species, then a formal BiOp was not required.  Our argument, inter alia, was that allowing mitigation planning during the biological assessment process created an incentive to mitigate adverse impacts.

The consultation regulations codified that approach as informal consultation and retained avoidance of formal consultation as an incentive to mitigate.  Unfortunately, the problem is assuring that the mitigation plans or modifications are performed, not just promises.  In Sierra Club v. Marsh, the 9th Circuit shut down the "empty promise" strategy.  In Forest Guardians, the 9th Circuit has now dealt with the "you can't tell whether its an empty promise if I don't monitor" strategy.  So those of us who think the incentive structure of informal consultation is good can sleep easier tonight.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/environmental_law/2006/06/forest_guardian.html

Biodiversity | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83564076069e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Forest Guardians Protect Informal Consultation:

Comments

Post a comment