CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Friday, April 14, 2017

Mungan on Over-Incarceration and Disenfranchisement

Mungan muratMurat C. Mungan (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty) has posted Over-Incarceration and Disenfranchisement (Public Choice, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

This article presents a model wherein law enforcers propose sentences to maximize their likelihood of reelection, and shows that elections typically generate over-incarceration, i.e., longer than optimal sentences. It then studies the effects of disenfranchisement laws, which prohibit convicted felons from voting. The removal of ex-convicts from the pool of eligible voters reduces the pressure politicians may otherwise face to protect the interests of this group, and thereby causes the political process to push the sentences for criminal offenses upwards. Therefore, disenfranchisement further widens the gap between the optimal sentence and the equilibrium sentence, and thereby exacerbates the problem of over-incarceration. Moreover, this result is valid even when voter turnout is negatively correlated with people's criminal tendencies, i.e., when criminals vote less frequently than non-criminals.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2017/04/mungan-on-over-incarceration-and-disenfranchisement.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment