CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, May 5, 2014

Rose on the FBI's Reluctance to Electronically Record Interrogations

Kristian Bryant Rose has posted Of Principle and Prudence: Analyzing the F.B.I.’S Reluctance to Electronically Record Interrogations (9 Okla. J.L. & Tech. 64 (2013)) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Currently, the F.B.I. maintains a policy that generally precludes electronically recording interrogations and interviews of suspects. Instead, the Bureau relies on “302 reports,” whereby an agent transcribes, by hand, what is said during an interview. But this practice is not without exception. In certain circumstances, the Special Agent in Charge of a field office may exercise discretion to allow the recording of an interview. Nonetheless, the majority of interactions between Special Agents and suspects during interrogations and interviews remain obscured – if not veiled – by analog practices.



A growing body of academic literature suggests concern for the improvidence and due process implications of refusing to record custodial interrogations. Part II of this comment argues: (1) that due process under the United States Constitution does not require the electronic recording of custodial interrogations, (2) that video footage fails to achieve maximum evidentiary objectivity, and (3) that courts should leave to law enforcement the freedom to determine investigative best practices. Part III explores the prudence of adopting a policy of video recordation despite a lack of constitutional compulsion.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2014/05/rose-on-the-fbis-reluctance-to-electronically-record-interrogations.html

| Permalink

Comments

I look forward to reading Part III...in which the author apparently argues the FBI should record interviews even if it isn't constitutionally required.

In a recent trial I covered as a writer each of three FBI agents admitted under cross examination that, in effect, notations in their 302 reports had colored/stretched defendants' actual words in order to make the defendants appear more culpable. I hope this sort of thing factors in to the author's argument for recording interviews.

Posted by: John K | May 8, 2014 8:57:55 AM

Post a comment